Available in Russian
Author: Georgiy Suvorov
Keywords: sovereignty; territorial dispute; Jerusalem; International Court of Justice; right to self-determination; Arab-Israeli conflict
The issue of sovereignty over the City of Jerusalem remains one of the most acute controversies within the Arab-Israeli conflict. Although this topic has attracted considerable attention from Russian political scientists, historians, and experts in regional studies, it has received relatively little coverage in Russian legal doctrine. This article begins by summarizing all the basic approaches to the problem found in foreign scholarship. It makes a comparative analysis of the official stances of key stakeholders in the issue of title to Jerusalem, namely, Palestine, Israel, and United Nations organs, notably the Security Council. It reviews possible practical solutions to the problem, with due regard for the necessity of ensuring the interests of the ethno-political communities concerned, recognizing equality of rights and implementation of the right of peoples to self-determination. The case brought by Palestine before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in 2018 about relocation of the United States Embassy to Jerusalem and a potential ICJ advisory opinion on Israel’s policy and actions in East Jerusalem and the West Bank are also assessed on the basis of the ICJ’s jurisprudence and the current political climate. In elucidating the issue of sovereignty over the disputed area, the author traces the history of the Holy City from the time of the last undisputed sovereign, the Ottoman Empire. For assessing the conduct of the parties asserting control over the area, the principle of inter-temporal law is applied. Having constructed the chain of relevant events, it is concluded that sovereignty over Jerusalem is still “in abeyance”, or suspended, for no party has yet filled the existing vacuum of sovereignty by lawful means. The territorial status of the Holy City remains to be determined through lengthy negotiations. In this regard, out of the several existing options, the approach of an Israeli-Palestinian condominium is deemed most preferable, for it leaves less room for further conflict. However, this solution, in the opinion of the author, should be coupled with some sort of provisional supervision by a supranational institution.
About the author: Georgiy Suvorov – Associate at “Sokolov, Maslov & Partners” Law Firm, Winner of the International Law in the 21st Century Award, Moscow, Russia.
Citation: Suvorov G. (2023) Mezhdunarodno-pravovoy status goroda Ierusalima: osnovnaya yuridicheskaya problema arabo-izrail’skogo konflikta [The status of the City of Jerusalem under international law: the critical legal issue in the Arab-Israeli conflict]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 120–153. (In Russian).
Abulekhiya Bakhaa N.M. (2017) Palestino-izrail’skiy konflikt: mezhdunarodno-pravovoy analiz: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [The Palestinian-Israeli conflict: an international legal analysis: Cand. in law sci. diss.], Moscow. (In Russian).
Alzoughbi B. (2019) The Relocation of the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem (Palestine v. United States of America): A Commentary on the Merits of the Case, Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice and Admissibility of Palestine’s Application. University of Bologna Law Review, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 114–205.
Baker A. (2012) Is Jerusalem Really Negotiable? An Analysis of Jerusalem’s Place in the Peace Process. Jewish Political Studies Review, vol. 24, no. 3/4, pp. 72–95.
Baron C.B. (1998) The International Legal Status of Jerusalem. Touro International Law Review, vol. 8, pp. 1–43.
Cassese A. (1986) Legal Considerations on the International Status of Jerusalem. The Palestinian Yearbook of International Law, vol. 3, pp. 13–39.
Cattan H. (1981) The Status of Jerusalem under International Law and United Nations Resolutions. Journal of Palestine Studies, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 3–15.
Chemillier-Gendreau M. (2013) Jérusalem, le droit international comme source de solution. Confluences Méditerranée, no. 86, pp. 57–69.
Clapham A. (2012) Brierly’s Law of Nations: An Introduction to the Role of International Law in International Relations, 7th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cotran E. (2001) The Jerusalem Question in International Law: The Way to a Solution. Islamic Studies, vol. 40, no. 3–4, pp. 487–500.
Crawford J. (2019) Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law, 9th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Danino O. (2013) Le statut de Jérusalem de 1949 à 1967. Cahiers de la méditerranée, vol. 86, pp. 207–218.
Eagleton C. (1948) Palestine and the Constitutional Law of the United Nations. The American Journal of International Law, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 397–399.
Gray C. (2008) International Law and the Use of Force, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gruhin M.I. (1980) Jerusalem: Legal & Political Dimensions in a Search for Peace. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 169–213.
Hales J. (1937) Some Legal Aspects of the Mandate System: Sovereignty, Nationality, Termination and Transfer. In: Transactions of the Grotius Society, vol. 23, London: Sweet and Maxwell, pp. 85–126.
Hirsch M. (2005) The Legal Status of Jerusalem Following the ICJ Advisory Opinion on the Separation Barrier. Israeli Law Review, vol. 38, no. 1–2, pp. 298–315.
Jennings R., Watts A. (eds.) (1996) Oppenheim’s International Law. vol. 1: Peace. Parts 2 to 4, 9th ed., London: Longman.
Jennings R.Y. (1963) The Acquisition of Territory in International Law, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Kattan V. (2011) Competing Claims, Contested City: The Sovereignty of Jerusalem under International Law. Available at: http://qatarconferences.org/jerusalem/doc1/doc31.pdf (accessed: 19.12.2022).
Kelly M.J. (1999) Restoring and Maintaining Order in Complex Peace Operations: The Search for a Legal Framework, Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International.
Kelsen H. (1950) The Law of the United Nations: A Critical Analysis of Its Fundamental Problems, London: Stevens and Sons.
Klimenko B.M. (1974) Gosudarstvennaya territoriya: Voprosy teorii i praktiki mezhdunarodnogo prava [State territory: Issues of theory and practice of international law], Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. (In Russian).
Lauterpacht E. (1968) Jerusalem and the Holy Places, London: The Anglo-Israel Association.
Malanczuk P. (1997) Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law, New York: Routledge.
Nagan W., Haddad A. (2012) Recognition of Palestinian Statehood: A Clarification of the Interests of the Concerned Parties. Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 341–421.
Quigley J. (1990) Palestine and Israel: A Challenge to Justice, Durham; London: Duke University Press.
Quigley J. (1994) The Legal Status of Jerusalem under International Law. Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, vol. 24, pp. 11–23.
Quigley J. (2010) (2010) The Statehood of Palestine: International Law in the Middle East Conflict, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Quigley J. (2013) The Six-Day War and Israeli Self-Defense: Questioning the Legal Basis for Preventive War, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Quigley J. (2016) The International Diplomacy of Israel’s Founders: Deception at the United Nations in the Quest for Palestine, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rahman O.H. (2020) The “State-Plus” Framework: A Confederal Solution for Israel-Palestine. Brookings Doha Center Analysis Paper no. 29. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/The-State-Plus-Framework-English.pdf (accessed: 19.12.2022).
Rizwanul Islam Md. (2019) The Case of Palestine Against the USA at the ICJ: A Non-Starter or Precedent-Setter? Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 1–27.
Schmidt-Sibeth H. (1965) Die Völkerrechtliche Probleme der Entstehung des Staates Israel: Doctoral Dissertation, Münich University.
Schwebel S.M. (1994) What Weight to Conquest? In: Justice in International Law: Selected Writings of Judge Stephen M. Schwebel, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 521–525.
Shaw M. (2017) International Law, 8th ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stover W.J., Mankaryous M. (2008) Sovereignty over Jerusalem: A Legal Solution to a Disputed Capital. International Journal on World Peace, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 115–136.
Taylor G.D. (1972–1973) The Content of the Rule against Abuse of Rights in International Law. British Yearbook of International Law, vol. 46, pp. 323–352.
Tunkin G.I. (2016) Teoriya mezhdunarodnogo prava [Theory of international law], Moscow: Zertsalo-M. (In Russian).
Van de Craen F. (1978–1979) The Territorial Title of the State of Israel to “Palestine”: An Appraisal in International Law. Revue Belge de Droit International, vol. 14, pp. 501–538.
Xue H. (2017) Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice, vol. 10, Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.
Yannis A. (2002) The Concept of Suspended Sovereignty in International Law and Its Implications in International Politics. European Journal of International Law, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1037–1052.