Available in Russian
Author: Aleksandr Evseev
DOI: 10.21128/2226-2059-2025-1-150-163
Keywords: futurology; science fiction; artificial intelligence; extraterrestrial intelligence; social imagination; international crime; anthropocentrism
This article is a review of the book, written by the German lawyer and international judge M.Bohlander, dedicated to the search for contacts with extraterrestrial civilizations. The author constructs a number of concepts with the help of which such research is given a legal dimension. In particular, this concerns the concept of “metalaw”, which is a certain set of norms and principles applicable in relations with artificial intelligence. The existing international legal regulation of this issue is clarified. Based on futurological works and science fiction, the author of the book tries to identify weak points in the existing regulatory framework, which hypothetically can become an insurmountable obstacle in the event of contact with aliens from other worlds or significantly damage it. The existing array of international human rights law and international humanitarian law is analyzed for the extent to which existing norms are designed for their application by other intelligent beings, besides humans. International crimes (crime of aggression, genocide) are also analyzed in terms of their possible reformatting in new conditions. Referring to sources of international space law, in particular the Declaration of Principles Relating to Actions Following the Detection of Extraterrestrial Intelligence of 1989 (as amended in 2010), approved by the International Astronautical Academy and the International Institute of Space Law, the author notes a number of provisions that oblige the parties that signed this Declaration not to respond to signals from outside without first receiving instructions and consent from the UN. However, in general, he comes to the conclusion that the existing international legal system is not ready to meet with representatives of extraterrestrial civilizations. The final point in the discussion about the direction in which international law, in particular international criminal law, should be developed is apparently a matter for the future, which will answer the questions outlined in the study under review.
About the author: Aleksandr Evseev – Candidate of Sciences (Ph.D.) in Law, Associate Professor, Russian State University of Justice, Moscow, Russia.
Citation: Evseev A. (2025) Voobrazhenie i mezhdunarodnoe pravo: Retsenziya na knigu: Bohlander M.Contact with Extraterrestrial Intelligence and Human Law: The Applicability of Rules of War and Human Rights. Leiden: Brill, 2023 [Imagination and the international law: Book review: Bohlander M.Contact with Extraterrestrial Intelligence and Human Law: The Applicability of Rules of War and Human Rights. Leiden: Brill, 2023]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.15, no.1, pp.150–163. (In Russian).
References
Antonov A., Evseev A. (2022) Spetsial'nyy sud po Kosovo — novyy organ mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo pravosudiya [Kosovo Specialist Chambers — a new organ of international criminal justice]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.12, no.1, pp.79–98. (In Russian).
Batalov E.Ya. (1972) Voobrazhenie i revolyutsiya [Imagination and revolution]. Voprosy filosofii, no.1, pp.68–80. (In Russian).
Blacksell M., Born K.M., Bohlander M. (2000) Law, Legal Services and Postcommunist Transition in Germany’s New Bundesländer. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, vol.18, no.3, pp.355–370.
Bohlander M. (2023) Contact with Extraterrestrial Intelligence and Human Law: The Applicability of Rules of War and Human Rights, Leiden: Brill.
Cheang S. (2019) International ECCC judge resigns from position. Khmer Times, 1 July. Available at: https://www.khmertimeskh.com/50619552/international-eccc-judge-resigns-from-position/ (accessed: 05.03.2025).
Feygin O. (2010) Vnezemnoy razum. Mify i real'nost' [Extraterrestrial intelligence. Myths and reality], Moscow: KoLibri, Azbuka-Attikus. (In Russian).
Ioyrysh A.I. (1978) Problema vnezemnykh tsivilizatsiy i “metapravo” [The problem of extraterrestrial civilizations and “metalaw”]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, no.9, pp.64–70. (In Russian).
Ispolinov A.S. (2024) Anatomiya krizisa: problemy sub'ektivnoy legitimnosti Mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo suda [The anatomy of the crisis: problems of the subjective legitimacy of the International Criminal Court]. Zakon, no.3, pp.68–75. (In Russian).
Ivanov Vyach.Vs. (1981) O zavisimosti struktury yazyka ot ustroystva, pol'zuyushchegosya yazykom [On the dependence of the structure of a language on the device using the language]. In: Kaplan S.A. (ed.) Problema poiska vnezemnykh tsivilizatsiy [The problem of the search for extraterrestrial civilizations], Moscow: Nauka, pp.196–207. (In Russian).
Ivanov Vyach.Vs. (2008) Uroki Strugatskikh [Lessons from the Strugatskys]. Zvezda, no.4, pp.200–217. (In Russian).
Karaganov S. (1999) Rossiya dvizhetsya k raspadu [Russia is heading towards disintegration]. Kommersant' Vlast', no.3, pp.22–23. (In Russian).
Kozyubra N.I. (1990) Yuridicheskaya nauka i perspektivnoe prognozirovanie [Legal science and future-oriented forecasting]. In: Metodologicheskie problemy yuridicheskoy nauki [Methodological problems of legal science], Kyiv: Naukova dumka, pp.55–69. (In Russian).
Luban D. (2013) After the Honeymoon: Reflections on the Current State of International Criminal Justice. Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol.11, no.3, pp.505–515.
Lyublinskiy P.I. (1917) Voprosy mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo prava v svyazi s nastoyashchey voynoy [Questions of international criminal law in relation to the present war]. Izvestiya Ministerstva inostrannykh del. Knigi I i II, pp.216–238. (In Russian).
Malashenko I.E. (1986) Politiko-psikhologicheskie aspekty programmy “Zvyozdnykh voyn” [Political and psychological aspects of the Star Wars program]. SShA — ekonomika, politika, ideologiya, no.7, pp.3–14. (In Russian).
Mydans S. (2022) 16 Years, 3 Convictions: The Khmer Rouge Trials Come to an End. The New York Times, 22 September. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/22/world/asia/cambodia-khmer-rouge-tribunal.html (accessed: 05.03.2025).
Rubanov A.A. (1977) Mezhdunarodnaya kosmichesko-pravovaya imushchestvennaya otvetstvennost' [International space law property liability], Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian).
Russkikh K. (2020) “A osadochek ostalsya”: kommentariy k resheniyam Mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo suda ot 12 aprelya 2019 goda i ot 5 marta 2020 goda [“A bitter aftertaste”: a commentary to the ICC decisions on the situation in Afghanistan of April 12, 2019 and March 5, 2020]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.10, no.2, pp.47–65. (In Russian).
Shakhnazarov G.Kh. (1981) Gryadushchiy miroporyadok [The coming world order], Moscow: Politizdat. (In Russian).
Shakhnazarov G.Kh. (1979) Fiasko futurologii [Futurology fiasko], Moscow: Izdatel'stvo politicheskoy literatury. (In Russian).
Vasiliev S. (2020) The Crises and Critiques of International Criminal Justice. In: Heller K.J., Mégret F., Nouwen S., Ohlin J., Robinson D. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of International Criminal Law, New York: Oxford University Press, pp.626–651.
Volevodz A.G., Volevodz V.A. (2009) Sovremennaya sistema mezhdunarodnoy ugolovnoy yustitsii: khrestomatiya [The modern international criminal justice system: Textbook], Moscow: Yurlitinform. (In Russian).
Volkogonov D.A. (1986) Fantasty i “zvyozdnye voyny” [Science fiction and “star wars”]. Oktyabr', no.1, pp.164–178. (In Russian).
Zhukov G.P., Kolosov Yu.M. (eds.) (1999) Mezhdunarodnoe kosmicheskoe pravo. Uchebnik [International space law. Textbook], Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. (In Russian).