Available in Russian
Author: Olga Kadysheva
DOI: 10.21128/2226-2059-2025-1-98-116
Keywords: jus cogens; general international law; regionalization; regional jus cogens; regional peremptory norms; regional legal order; UN International Law Commission; Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties 1969
According to the common definition, a peremptory norm of general international law (jus cogens) is a norm that is accepted and recognized by the international community of states as a whole as a norm from which no deviation is permissible and which can be modified only by a subsequent norm of general international law of the same character. Modern legal scholarship and international courts recognize the existence of jus cogens in international law, but studies have noted the almost complete absence of its practical application. Moreover, the universalism that underpins the doctrine of jus cogens has lately been confronted with the challenges of the fragmentation of the international legal order and the formation of a multipolar world. States are increasingly uniting into geographical, linguistic, or cultural groups to implement joint projects, which inevitably influences international law that already includes specific norms protecting values recognised as fundamental at the regional level. The formation of regional legal orders will inevitably lead to the challenge of identifying and applying local norms of special legal force (local or particular peremptory norms of jus cogens) within these orders. These regional norms play an important role in identifying common and shareable fundamental values within a particular community of states, consolidating ideas and serving as a basis for cooperation among these states in solving certain social and political challenges they face. The widespread notion in academic discourse that regional jus cogens norms do not exist does not mean that regional legal orders are not entitled to independently declare the fundamental nature of a number of their norms, the contradiction with which makes other regional norms invalid. To ensure equality and differential approach, regional jus cogens should be seen as a concept intended for selective application. In this context, complex issues arise regarding possible interaction between universal and regional peremptory norms, whether in terms of prioritizing the former, treating the letter as lex specialis for the second norms, or allowing permissible exceptions to universal norms. This article, without purporting to address all possible issues, aims at identifying the problematics of regional jus cogens norms as part of the broader discussion on peremptory norms of international law.
About the author: Olga Kadysheva – Candidate of Sciences (Ph.D.) in Law, Associate Professor, Department of International Law, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Citation: Kadysheva O. (2025) Regional'nye imperativnye normy v mezhdunarodnom prave: mif ili real'nost' [Regional peremptory norms in international law: myth or reality]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.15, no.1, pp.98–116. (In Russian).
References
Chernichenko S.V. (2012) Vzaimosvyaz' imperativnykh norm mezhdunarodnogo prava (jus cogens) i obyazatel'stv erga omnes [Interconnection of peremptory norms of international law and erga omnes obligations]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, no.3, pp.3–17. (In Russian).
Gaja G. (1981) Jus Cogens beyond the Vienna Convention. The Hague Academy Collected Courses Online, vol.172, pp.279–289.
Hasmath R. (2012) The Utility of Regional Peremptory Norms in International Affairs: Paper presented at American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, 2 August — 2 September, New Orleans. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1366803 (accessed: 10.03.2025).
Ispolinov A. (2016) Sudebnyy aktivizm i sudebnoe normotvorchestvo Suda Evropeyskogo Soyuza [Judicial activism and judicial rule-making of the Court of Justice of the European Union]. Mezhdunarodnoye pravosudie, vol.6, no.1, pp.81–94. (In Russian).
Ispolinov A.S. (2014) Normy jus cogens v resheniyakh mezhdunarodnykh i natsional'nykh sudov [Jus cogens norms in judgments of international and national courts]. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, no.6, pp.7–14. (In Russian).
Kolb R. (2021) Peremptory Norms as a Legal Technique Rather than Substantive Super-Norms. In: Tladi D. (ed.) Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens), Leiden: Brill, pp.21–43.
Kremnev P.P. (2021) Obshchepriznannye printsipy i normy jus cogens i obyazatel'stva erga omnes: yuridicheskaya priroda i ierarkhiya v rossiyskoy pravovoy sisteme [Generally recognized principles and norms of jus cogens and erga omnes obligations: legal nature and hierarchy in the Russian legal system]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo, no.3, pp.783–802. (In Russian).
Lima L.C., Marotti L. (2005) An Unlikely Duo? Regionalism and Jus Cogens in International Law. Goettingen Journal of International Law, vol.12, no.1, pp.219–239.
Linderfalk U. (2008) The Effect of Jus Cogens Norms: Whoever Opened Pandora’s Box, Did You Ever Think About the Consequences? European Journal of International Law, vol.18, no.5, pp.853−871.
Linderfalk U. (2015) Understanding the Jus Cogens Debate: The Pervasive Influence of Legal Positivism and Legal Idealism. In: Heijer M., van der Wilt H. (eds.) Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, pp.51–84.
Rozakis С.L. (1976) The Concept of Jus Cogens in the Law of Treaties, Amsterdam; New York; Oxford: North-Holland.
Shestakov L.N. (1981) Imperativnye normy v sisteme sovremennogo mezhdunarodnogo prava [Peremptory norms in the system of international law], Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta. (In Russian).
Šturma Р. (2021) Is There Any Regional Jus Cogens in Europe? The Case of the European Convention on Human Rights. In: Tladi D. (ed.) Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens), Leiden: Brill, pp.302–318.
Tladi D. (2019) Codification, Progressive Development, New Law, Doctrine, and the Work of the International Law Commission on Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens): Personal Reflections of the Special Rapporteur. FIU Law Review, vol.13, no.6, pp.1137–1150.
Tladi D. (2021) The ILC’s Draft Conclusions on Peremptory Norms of General International Law: Personal Reflections of the Special Rapporteur. Austrian Review of International and European Law Online, vol.24, no.1, pp.121–140.
Tunkin G. (1971) Jus Cogens in Contemporary International Law. University of Toledo Law Review, vol.3, no.1, pp.107–118.
Virally М. (1966) Réflexions sur le “jus cogens”. Annuaire Français de Droit International, vol.12, pp.5–29.
Von Verdross A. (1966) Jus Dispositivum and Jus Cogens in International Law. American Journal of International Law, vol.60, no.1, pp.55–63.
De Wet Е. (2006) The Emergence of International and Regional Value Systems as a Manifestation of the Emerging International Constitutional Order. Leiden Journal of International Law, vol.19, no.3, pp.611–632.
Zouapet A. (2021) To Be or Not to Be Imperative: Jus Cogens Between Universal Vocation and Regional Claims. Questions of International Law, vol.86, pp.47–70.