Available in Russian
Author: Andrey Antonov
DOI: 10.21128/2226-2059-2025-1-117-135
Keywords: Kosovo; Serbia; Kosovo Liberation Army; armed conflict; Council of Europe; justice; international criminal law; international crimes
Both the theory of international criminal law and the juridical bodies applying its norms have been paying significant attention to the crimes committed during the bloody armed conflicts in the territory of the former Yugoslavia. The last conflict in Kosovo (1998–1999), unfortunately, has received limited focus within the activity and the jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. The rare cases related to that conflict mostly ignored the numerous crimes committed against the Serbian population. At the same time, there were reports of crimes, including those committed by organized criminal groups, against the non-Albanian population of the province, among which were allegations of illegal trafficking in human organs. These reports had been initially made public by the former ICTY Prosecutor and were then investigated by the Council of Europe Special Rapporteur, who found them to be credible. Following prolonged preparatory efforts, Specialist Chambers and Specialist Prosecutor’s Office have been established. In the author’s view, the most adequate term to use referring to both “pillars” of this judicial institution simultaneously is “Specialised Tribunal”. Author believes that the creation of this “Specialist Tribunal” by the international community may be considered as an attempt to react to those allegations, objectively investigate them, identify the perpetrators, and bring them to justice. The article identifies the key issues related to the establishment and operation of the Tribunal and provides an overview of the six cases currently under its consideration. Analysing the process of its establishment, the author deems that Kosovo authorities were de facto forced to accept its establishment within Kosovo’s legal framework. The study relies on publicly available official records, including relevant materials of the Council of Europe and the European Union, electronic databases, judgments and decisions of the Kosovo Specialized Chambers. Based on quantitative assessment methods and comparative analysis of open statistics on the prosecution of international crimes in Kosovo, the author concludes that there is a certain “one-sidedness” in international and local justice, which favours Kosovo Albanian victims. The author’s leaves open the question of whether this Tribunal can somehow rectify this imbalance.
About the author: Andrey Antonov – Doctor of Sciences in Law, Assistant Professor, Criminal Procedure Department, School of Law, Ulyanovsk State University, Ulyanovsk, Russia.
Citation: Antonov A. (2025) Spetsializirovannyy tribunal po Kosovo — vynuzhdennoe pravosudie? [Specialist tribunal for Kosovo — forced justice?] Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.15, no.1, pp.117–135. (In Russian).
References
(2004) Genocide, War Crimes, and Crimes Against Humanity: Topical Digest of the Case Law of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, New York: Human Rights Watch.
(2007) Zločin i kazna: procesuiranje ratnih zločina počinjenih u Bosni i Hercegovini pred međunarodnim krivičnim sudom za bivšu Jugoslaviju [Crime and punishment: prosecution of war crimes committed in Bosnia and Herzegovina before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia], Sarajevo: Fond Otvoreno društvo, Bosnia i Hercegovina. (In Bosnian).
Abegunde B., Filani A.O. (2017) Juxtaposition between the Theory of Joint Criminal Enterprise (JCE) and the Theory of Command/Superior Responsibility under International Law. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, vol.7, no.3, pp.70–85.
Antonov A., Evseev A. (2022) Spetsial’nyy sud po Kosovo — novyy organ mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo pravosudiya [Kosovo Specialist Chambers — a new organ of international criminal justice]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.12, no.1, pp.79–98. (In Russian).
Antonov A., Yevsieiev O. (2020) Bor'ba s beznakazannost'yu v Kosovo: odna territoriya — dve parallel'nye real'nosti? [The fight against impunity in Kosovo: one territory — two “parallel” realities?] Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.10, no.2, pp.126–137. (In Russian).
Del Ponte C. (2009) Madame Prosecutor. Confrontation with Humanity’s Worst Criminals and the Culture of Impunity, New York: Other Press.
Danner A.M. (2004) Joint Criminal Enterprise and Contemporary International Criminal Law. Available at: http://www.slobodan-milosevic.org/news/asal2004.htm (accessed: 23.02.2025).
Gashi S. (2020) How to Defend the Liberation War? Prishtina Insight, 28 September. Available at: https://prishtinainsight.com/how-to-defend-the-liberation-war/ (accessed: 23.02.2025).
Gibson C.H. (2008) Testing the Legitimacy of the Joint Criminal Enterprise Doctrine in the ICTY: A Comparison of Individual Liability for Group Conduct in International and Domestic Law. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, vol.18, no.2, pp.521–548.
Grigor’ev V.N., Antonov A.N. (2013) Reshenie tribunala po byvshey Yugoslavii po delu Gotovina/Markach kak (ocherednoy) proval mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya [The decision of the Tribunal on former Yugoslavia on Gotovina/Markach case as a (regular) failure of international justice]. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaya yustitsiya, no.3, pp.9–15. (In Russian).
Hehir A. (2019) Lessons Learned? The Kosovo Specialist Chambers’ Lack of Local Legitimacy and Its Implications. Human Rights Review, vol.20, no.3, pp.267–287.
Heinze A. (2017) The Kosovo Specialist Chambers’ Rules of Procedure and Evidence. EJIL: Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law, 17 August. Available at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-kosovo-specialist-chambers-rules-of-procedure-and-evidence/ (accessed: 23.02.2025).
Laughland J. (2009) Parodiya na pravosudie. Gaagskiy tribunal protiv Slobodana Miloshevicha [Travesty: the trial of Slobodan Milosevic and the corruption of international justice], Moscow: Russkaya panorama. (In Russian).
Meernik J. (2003) Victor’s Justice or the Law? Judging and Punishing at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Journal of Conflict Resolution, vol.47, no.2, pp.140–162.
Ochs S.L., Walters K. (2022) Forced Justice: The Kosovo Specialist Chambers. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law, vol.32, no.2, pp.239–285.
Ohlin J.D. (2012) Why the Gotovina Appeals Judgment Matters. EJIL:Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law, 21 December. Available at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/why-the-gotovina-appeals-judgment-matters/ (accessed: 23.02.2025).
Peskin V. (2005) Beyond Victor’s Justice? The Challenge of Prosecuting the Winners at the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. Journal of Human Rights, vol.4, no.2, pp.213–231.
Van Sliedregt E. (2019) Joint Criminal Confusion: Exploring the Merits and Demerits of Joint Enterprise Liability. In: Krebs B. (ed.) Accessorial Liability after Jogee, Oxford: Hart Publishing. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/217701114.pdf (accessed: 23.02.2025).
Visoka G. (2017) Assessing the Potential Impact of the Kosovo Specialist Court, Utrecht: PAX. Available at: https://www.impunitywatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Report_Assessing_Impact_Kosovo_Special_Court_2017_eng-1.pdf (accessed: 23.02.2025).