Available in Russian
Author: Alexey Ispolinov
DOI: 10.21128/2226-2059-2025-1-70-97
Keywords: jus cogens; peremptory norms; Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties; VCLT; International Law Commission; ILC; international justice
The doctrine of peremptory norms of general international law (jus cogens) was reflected in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) more than half a century ago and is considered by scholars to be one of the most controversial phenomena of modern international law. Currently it is unclear how exactly peremptory norms appear, and who proclaims their jus cogens status and at what point. Despite many publications, the inclusion of jus cogens doctrine in the text of the VCLT and in the ILC Draft conclusions on identification and legal consequences of peremptory norms of general international law of 2022 (ILC Draft conclusions), the nature, content and legal effect of jus cogens remains unconvincingly formulated and therefore controversial, while the doctrine itself has reached its limits with quite scarce practical results. The contradictory attitude of States towards the doctrine of jus cogens, when they verbally support this doctrine but do not apply it in practice, rather indicates its rhetorical value and the absence of any practical value. In turn, the lack of practice and the desire of States to develop such practice raises the issue of the normative meaning of the doctrine. Despite the expectations caused by the return of the ILC to the issue of jus cogens in the second decade of the 21st century, the Draft Conclusions developed by the Commission have already caused reasonable complaints due to the lack of clarity regarding the requirements under which the norm acquires the status of jus cogens. The developed ILC methodology for identifying such norms with the need to find convincing evidence of double opinio juris looks difficult to implement in practice. In addition, the methodology is radically at odds with the approach of international courts which tend to declare the existence of such peremptory norms without any justification. Because of this, it is very likely that the Draft Conclusions of the ILC will be ignored by the courts and States in terms of the methodology for identifying jus cogens, which casts doubt on the value of the Commission’s work in this regard.
About the author: Alexey Ispolinov – Doctor of Sciences in Law, Professor, Russian Foreign Trade Academy, Moscow, Russia.
Citation:
Ispolinov A. (2025) Neskol'ko zhizney doktriny imperativnykh norm (jus cogens) v mezhdunarodnom prave [The lives of the doctrine of peremptory norms (jus cogens) in international law]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.15, no.1, pp.70–97. (In Russian).
References
(1987) Restatement of the Law Third: The Foreign Relations Law of the United States. Vols.1 and 2, St.Paul, MN: American Law Institute.
Abi-Saab J. (1973) The Third World and the Future of the International Legal Order. Revue Egyptienne de Droit International, vol.29, pp.27–66.
Ahmed T., Butler I. (2006) The European Union and Human Rights: An International Law Perspective. European Journal of International Law, vol.17, no.4, pp.771–801.
Aleksidze LA. (1982) Nekotorye voprosy teorii mezhdunarodnogo prava. Imperativnye normy. Jus cogens [Certain questions of the international law theory. Peremptory norms. Jus cogens], Tbilisi: Izdatel'stvo Tbilisskogo universiteta. (In Russian).
Contreras-Garduño D., Alvarez-Rio I. (2014) A Barren Effort? The Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on Jus Cogens. Revista do Instituto Brasileiro de Direitos Humanos, vol.14, no.14, pp.113–131.
Anufrieva L.P. (2021) Printsipy v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave (nekotorye voprosy ponyatiya, prirody, genezisa, sushchnosti i soderzhaniya [Principles in modern international law (certain issues of concept, nature, genesis, substance and scope)]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, no.1, pp.6–27. (In Russian).
Arangio-Ruiz G. (1979) The Nations Declaration on Friendly Relations and the System of the Sources of International Law, Alphen aan den Rijn; Germantown, MD: Sijthoff & Noordhoff.
Bartsch K., Elberling B. (2003) Jus Cogens vs. State Immunity, Round Two: The Decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the Kalogeropoulou et al. v. Greece and Germany Decision. German Law Journal, vol.4, no.5, pp.477–491.
Bekyashev K.A. (2004) Pravotvorchestvo v mezhdunarodnom prave [Lawmaking in international law]. Lex Russica, no.3, pp.776–789. (In Russian). (In Russian).
Bianchi A. (2008) Human Rights and the Magic of Jus Cogens. European Journal of International Law, vol.19, no.3, pp.491–508.
Brownlie I. (1988) Comment. In: Cassese A., Weiler J.H.H. (eds.) Change and Stability in International Law-Making, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.
Cassese A. (2005) International Law, 2nd ed., New York: Oxford University Press.
Cassese A. (2012) For an Enhanced Role of Jus Cogens. In: Cassese A. (ed.) Realizing Utopia: The Future of International Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.158–171.
Chernichenko S.V. (2018) Evropeyskiy sud po pravam cheloveka: problema neispolnimosti postanovleniy [The European Court on Human Rights: the problem of unenforceable judgments]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, no.3, pp.6–17. (In Russian).
Chernichenko S.V. (2018) Maksima “pravo ne voznikaet iz pravonarusheniya” i smenyaemost' imperativnykh norm mezhdunarodnogo prava [The maxim “law does not arise from the violation of law” and the modification of peremptory norms]. Pravovedenie, no.1, pp.6–19. (In Russian).
Colangelo A.J. (2022) Procedural Jus Cogens. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, vol.60, no.2, pp.377–492.
Criddle E.J., Fox-Decent E. (2009) A Fiduciary Theory of Jus Cogens. The Yale Journal of International Law, vol.34, no.2, pp.331–387.
D’Amato A. (1990) It’s a Bird, it’s a Plane, it’s Jus Cogens! Connecticut Journal of International Law, vol.6, no.1, pp.1–6.
Danilenko G. (1991) International Jus Cogens: Issues of Law-Making. European Journal of International Law, vol.2, no.1, pp.42–65.
D’Aspremont J. (2015) Jus Cogens as a Social Construct without Pedigree. In: Heijer M., van der Wilt H. (eds.) Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, pp.85–114.
Fabri H.R. (2012) Enhancing the Rhetoric of Jus Cogens. European Journal of International Law, vol.23, no.4, pp.1049–1058.
Fabri H.R. (2022) The Eternal Question of Jus Cogens Running into Procedural Hurdles. Austrian Review of International and European Law Online, vol.24, no.1, pp.141–161.
Fabri H.R, Stoppioni E. (2022) Jus Cogens Before International Courts: The Mega-Political Side of the Story. Law and Contemporary Problems, vol.84, no.4, pp.153–180.
Ford C.A. (1994) Adjudicating Jus Cogens. Wisconsin International Law Journal, vol.13, pp.145–181.
Guan S.S. (2017) Jus Cogens: To Revise a Narrative. Minnesota Journal of International Law, vol.26, no.2, pp.461–499.
Haimbaugh G.D., Jr. (1987) Jus Cogens: Root and Branch (an Inventory). Touro Law Review, vol.3, no.2, pp.203–227.
Hossain K. (2005) The Concept of Jus Cogens and the Obligation Under the UN Charter. Santa Clara Journal of International Law, vol.3, no.1, pp.72–98.
Jovanovic M. (2020) Jus Cogens: A Complex Case of Constitutional Reasoning in International Law. Rechtsphilosophie, vol.6, no.3, pp.249–262.
Kadelbach S. (2015) Genesis, Function and Identification of Jus Cogens Norms. In: Heijer M., van der Wilt H. (eds.) Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, pp.147–172.
Lima L.C., Marotti L. (2005) An Unlikely Duo? Regionalism and Jus Cogens in International Law. Goettingen Journal of International Law, vol.12, no.1, pp.219–239.
Linderfalk U. (2008) The Effect of Jus Cogens Norms: Whoever Opened Pandora’s Box, Did You Ever Think About the Consequences? European Journal of International Law, vol.18, no.5, pp.853−871.
Linderfalk U. (2015) Understanding the Jus Cogens Debate: The Pervasive Influence of Legal Positivism and Legal Idealism. In: Heijer M., van der Wilt H (eds.) Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, pp.51–84.
Linderfalk U. (2020) The Legal Consequences of Jus Cogens and the Individuation of Norms. Leiden Journal of International Law, vol.33, no.4, pp.893–909.
Linderfalk U. (2020) Understanding Jus Cogens in International Law and International Legal Discourse, Cheltenham; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Lipkina N.N. (2011) Nekotorye problemy pravovoy prirody norm jus cogens v sovremennom mezhdunarodnom prave [Certain problems of the legal nature of jus cogens in contemporary international law]. Vestnik Saratovskoy gosudarstvennoy akademii prava, no.2, pp.146–150. (In Russian).
Lipkina N.N. (2019) Osobennosti kvalifikatsii mezhdunarodno-pravovykh norm o pravakh cheloveka v kachestve jus cogens [Specific features of qualification of international legal norms on human rights as jus cogens]. Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn', no.3, pp.51–55. (In Russian).
De Londras F. (2007) The Religiosity of Jus Cogens: A Moral Case for Compliance? In: Rehman J., Breau S. (eds.) Religion, Human Rights and International Law: A Critical Examination of Islamic Law and Practices, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp.247–280.
Marusin I.S. (2022) Pervyy prigovor Spetsial'nogo tribunala po Livanu [First judgment of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Pravo, no.3, pp.712–724. (In Russian).
Merdekawati A., Triatmodjo M., Hasibuan I. (2024) Common Heritage of Mankind Beyond Treaty Provisions: Customary or General Principle? Indonesian Journal of International Law, vol.21, no.3, pp.503–526.
Michaelsen С. (2009) Kadi and Al Barakaat v. Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities: The Incompatibility of the United Nations Security Council’s 1267 Sanctions Regime with European Due Process Guarantees. Melbourne Journal of International Law, vol.10, no.1, pp.329–345.
Mik C. (2013) Jus Cogens in Contemporary International Law. Polish Yearbook of International Law, vol.33, pp.27–93.
Onuf N.G., Birney R.K. (1974) Peremptory Norms of International Law: Their Source, Function and Future. Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, vol.4, no.2, pp.187–198.
Paulus A.L. (2005) Jus Cogens in a Time of Hegemony and Fragmentation — An Attempt at a Re-appraisal. Nordic Journal of International Law, vol.74, no.3, pp.297–334.
Pellet A. (2005) Conclusions. In: Tomuschat C., Thouvenin J.-M. (eds.) The Fundamental Rules of the International Legal Order. Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp.417–424.
Saul M. (2015) Identifying Jus Cogens Norms: The Interaction of Scholars and International Judges. Asian Journal of International Law, vol.5, no.1, pp.26–54.
Sazonova K.L. (2014) Obyazatel'stva erga omnes i normy jus cogens v mezhdunarodnom prave: kontseptual'noe oformlenie i pravoprimenitel'naya praktika [Obligations erga omnes and jus cogens in international law: conceptual formalization and law enforcement practice]. Gosudarstvo i pravo, no.11, pp.72–79. (In Russian).
Schwarzenberger G. (1965) International Jus Cogens? Texas Law Review, vol.43, pp.455–478.
Shelton D. (2015) Sherlock Holmes and the Mystery of Jus Cogens. In: Heijer M., van der Wilt H. (eds.) Netherlands Yearbook of International Law, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, pp.23–50.
Shestakov L.N. (1981) Imperativnye normy v sisteme sovremennogo mezhdunarodnogo prava [Peremptory norms in the system of international law], Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta. (In Russian).
Simma B. (1995) The Contribution of Alfred Verdross to the Theory of International Law. European Journal of International Law, vol.6, no.1, pp.33–54.
Sinyakin I.I., Skuratova A.Yu. (2018) Normy jus cogens: istoricheskiy aspekt i sovremennoe znachenie dlya mezhdunarodnogo prava [Jus cogens: the historical aspect and contemporary value for international law]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki, no.3, pp.526–545. (In Russian).
Stephan P. (2021) The Political Economy of Jus Cogens. Vanderbilt Law Review, vol.44, no.4, pp.1073–1104.
Suy E. (1967) The Concept of Jus Cogens in Public International Law. In: Papers and Proceedings, Conference on International Law, Lagonissi (Greece), April 3–8, 1966. Vol.II, Geneva: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, pp.17–77.
Sztucki J. (1974) Jus Cogens and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties: A Critical Appraisal, Wien; New York: Springer.
Tladi D. (2019) Codification, Progressive Development, New Law, Doctrine, and the Work of the International Law Commission on Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens): Personal Reflections of the Special Rapporteur. FIU Law Review, vol.13, no.6, pp.1137–1150.
Tladi D. (2021) The ILC’s Draft Conclusions on Peremptory Norms of General International Law: Personal Reflections of the Special Rapporteur. Austrian Review of International and European Law Online, vol.24, no.1, pp.121–140.
Tladi D. (2024) The International Law Commission’s Draft Conclusions on Peremptory Norms, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tladi D. (ed.) (2021) Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens), Leiden: Brill, pp.668–688.
Tunkin G. (1971) Jus Cogens in Contemporary International Law. University of Toledo Law Review, vol.3, no.1, pp.107–118.
Tunkin G.I. (2025) Teoriya mezhdunarodnogo prava [Theory of international law], Moscow: Zertsalo-M. (In Russian).
Viñuales J.E. (2021) The Friendly Relations Declaration and Peremptory Norms. In: Tladi D. (ed.) Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens), Leiden: Brill, pp.668–688.
Vlasov D.S. (2006) Imperativnye normy jus cogens i pravovye pozitsii Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON [Peremptory norms of jus cogens and legal positions of the UN International Court of Justice]. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, no.1, pp.128–132. (In Russian).
Von Verdross A. (1937) Forbidden Treaties in International Law: Comments on Professor Garner’s Report on “The Law of Treaties”. American Journal of International Law, vol.31, no.4, pp.571–577.
Von Verdross A. (1966) A Jus Dispositivum and Jus Cogens in International Law. American Journal of International Law, vol.60, no.1, pp.55–63.
Weisburd M. (1995) The Emptiness of the Concept of Jus Cogens, as illustrated by the War in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Michigan Journal of International Law, vol.17, no.1, pp.1–51.
De Wet E. (2013) Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes. In: Shelton D. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law, New York: Oxford University Press, pp.541–561.
De Wet E. (2019) Entrenching International Values Through Positive Law: The (Limited) Effect of Peremptory Norms. KFG Working Paper no.25, Berlin: German Research Foundation.
Whiteman M. (1977) Jus Cogens in International law, with a Projected List. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, vol.7, no.2, pp.609–627.
Wood M. (2023) Values in the International Community: Jus Cogens in light of the International Law Commission’s 2022 Conclusions. KFG Working Paper no.61, Berlin: Freie Universität.
Zouapet A. (2021) To Be or Not to Be Imperative: Jus Cogens Between Universal Vocation and Regional Claims. Questions of International Law, vol.86, pp.47–70.