Available in Russian
Author: Kirill Entin
Keywords: general principles of law; Court of Justice of the European Union; Court of the Eurasian Economic Union; proportionality; legal certainty
The formulation by the Court of Justice of the European Union of general principles of EU law is rightly characterized as one of the most symbolic and inspired examples of judicial activism, as it allowed the CJEU not only to complete the inevitable lacunas in the founding treaties, but also to ensure the protection of the rule of law and human rights within the integrated EU. In an analysis of the functions of the general principles of EU law, their origins, and the criteria used by the CJEU to identify them, the author argues in favor of a restrictive reading of the notion of “general principles of EU law”, excluding those principles used to describe the institutional structure of the EU or the specificity of its legal order. An analysis of the EAEU Court’s case law allows the author to reach the conclusion that, while the Court first made use of the term “general principles of the Union’s law” in an advisory opinion on public procurement in 2021, the process of creating its own system of principles started in 2016–2017. This is demonstrated in part by the Court’s systematic referral to the principles of proportionality and legal certainty not only in order to interpret Union law provisions but as separate requirements that allow it to determine whether the Commission decisions and acts of the Member States comply with EAEU law. The author expresses the opinion that the creation of such a legal category is a necessity for courts of integrated unions due to the special nature of integration law, which by its subject is closer to national than to public international law. In this regard the general principles of law of an integrated union allow a link to be maintained with both international law and the constitutional legal orders of their Member States.
About the author: Kirill Entin – Candidate of Sciences (PhD) in Law, Deputy Registrar – Head of the Legal Research and Analysis Department, Minsk, Belarus; Head of the Eurasian Sector of the Centre for Comprehensive European and International Studies, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.
Citation: Entin K. (2022) Obshchie printsipy prava integratsionnykh ob'edineniy kak taynoe oruzhie Suda ES i Suda EAES [General principles of integration law as a secret weapon of the CJEU and of the Eurasian Economic Union Court]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 64–83. (In Russian).
Arnull A. (2006) The European Union and Its Court of Justice, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chayka K.L. (2022) Pravovaja opredelennost’ kak kriterij dejstvitel’nosti reshenij o klassifikacii otdel’nyh vidov tovarov v integracionnyh ob’edinenijah [Legal certainty as a Criteria for the Validity of the Decisions of the Eurasian Economic Commission on the Classification of a Particular Commodity]. Vestnik tamozhennoj akademii, no. 1, pp. 59–67. (In Russian).
Diyachenko E. (2020) Sudebnyy aktivizm i ego rol’ v praktike mezhdunarodnykh sudov [Judicial activism and its role in case-law of international courts]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 103–125. (In Russian).
Dyachenko E.B., Entin K.V. (2018) Svoystva prava Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza skvoz’ prizmu praktiki Suda EAES [Properties of the EAEC law through the prism of the practice of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no. 10, pp. 123–133. (In Russian).
Dyachenko E.B., Entin K.V. (2021) Pravo konkurentsii [Competition law]. In: Sud Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza i stanovlenie prava EAES: monografiya [The Court of the Eurasian Economic Union and the formation of the law of the EAEU: a monograph], Moscow: Prospekt, pp. 259–286. (In Russian).
Dyachenko E.B., Entin K.V. (2021) Rol’ konsul’tativnykh zaklyucheniy Suda EAES v razvitii prava konkurentsii Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza [The role of the advisory opinions of the EAEU Court in the development of competition law of the Eurasian Economic Union]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, no. 4, pp. 177–204. (In Russian).
Dyachenko E.B., Entin K.V. (2021) Tolkovanie s oporoy na konstitutsionnye traditsii gosudarstv-chlenov i zashchita prav cheloveka Sudom Evropeyskogo Soyuza i Sudom Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza [Interpretation based on the constitutional traditions of the Member States and the protection of fundamental rights by the Court of the European Union and the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no. 4, pp. 173–186. (In Russian).
Entin K.V. (2020) Pravo Evropeyskogo Soyuza skvoz’ prizmu praktiki Suda Evropeyskogo Soyuza [The law of the European Union through the prism of the practice of the Court of Justice of the European Union], Moscow: Statut. (In Russian).
Entin M., Voynikov V. (2019) Institutional and Legal Development of EAEU and EU in Comparative Perspective. Russian Law Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 155–168.
Entin K., Diyachenko E. (2019) Obzor praktiki Suda Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza v 2018 godu [An overview of the case-law of the Eurasian Economic Union Court in 2018]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3–22. (In Russian).
Gutiérrez-Fons J.A., Lenaerts K. (2010) The Constitutional Allocation of Powers and General Principles of EU Law. Common Market Law Review, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1629–1669.
Harbo T.-I. (2015) The Function of Proportionality Analysis in European Law, Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.
Hartley T.C. (2014) The Foundations of European Union Law: An Introduction to the Constitutional and Administrative Law of the European Union, 8th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Karliuk M. (2018) The Eurasian Economic Union: An Emerging Autonomous Legal Order? Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-8586669 (accessed: 09.06.2022).
Lasser M. (2004) Judicial Deliberations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Neuvonen P.J., Ziegler K.S. (2022) General Principles in the EU Legal Order: Past, Present and Future Directions. In: Ziegler K.S., Neuvonen P.J, Moreno-Lax V. (eds.) Research Handbook on General Principles in EU Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 7–24.
Petrić D. (2019) Game of Courts: A Tale of Principles and Institutions. European Law Journal, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 273–291.
Pirker B. (2013) Proportionality Analysis and Models of Judicial Review: A Theoretical and Comparative Study, Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.
Plender R. (1995) Equality and Non-Discrimination in the Law of European Union. Pace International Law Review, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 57–80.
Sarmiento D. (2010) Ne Bis in Idem in the Case Law of the European Court of Justice. In: van Bockel B. (ed.) The “Ne Bis in Idem” Principle in EU Law, Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, pp. 103–130.
Tridimas T. (2006) The General Principles of EU Law, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tridimas T. (2016) The General Principles of Law: Who Needs Them? Cahiers de droit europeen, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 419–441.
Wimmer M. (2014) The Dinghy’s Rudder: General Principles of European Union Law through the Lens of Proportionality. European Public Law, vol. 20. no. 2, pp. 331–353.
De Witte B. (2000) Institutional Principles: A Special Category of General Principles of EC Law. In: Bernitz U., Nergelius J. (eds.) General Principles of European Community Law: Reports from a Conference in Malmö, 27–28, August 1999: Organised by the Swedish Network for European Legal Studies and the Faculty of Law, University of Lund, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, pp. 143–159.