Available in Russian
Author: Aleksandr Evseev
Keywords: Nuremberg Trial 1945–1946; small (subsequent) Nuremberg trials 1946–1949; international criminal justice; criminal liability of businessmen under international law; social responsibility of business; corporate criminal liability
The article addresses the international criminal liability of businesses. It is considered in two aspects: the individual liability of businessmen acting in their personal capacity and the liability of corporate entities created by private law. The author analyzes this issue in historical terms, starting his research from the end of the Second World War and ending with the latest cases adjudicated by internationalized (hybrid) courts. He concludes that, in general, businessmen rarely appear as defendants in international criminal justice bodies and corporations almost never do. The emerging trend of limiting the prosecution of international crimes exclusively to those committed by military and political leaders to the detriment of the persecution of business representatives undoubtedly reduces the effectiveness and humanistic potential of international criminal courts and tribunals. In general, the article asserts the need for a more flexible approach to the international criminal liability of big business. In this regard, the appeal “Back to Nuremberg!”, which is advanced by some Russian legal scholars, seems promising. The article emphasizes that the international community, at the stage of preparing the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, narrowed the possibility of applying international criminal law to business structures by refusing to provide for the criminal responsibility of legal entities. Thus a business person can appear in the dock in the Hague only in his personal capacity. The author comes to the conclusion that despite the relatively small number of criminal cases related to the commission of international crimes by representatives of big business, these crimes are increasingly a concern of law enforcement. A kind of surrogate for bringing these businesses to legal responsibility is the imposition of personal and corporate sanctions that do not require preliminary investigation and the establishment of relevant legal facts (such as cooperation with criminal regimes), are imposed by decisions of political authorities, and are subject to challenge in national and international courts.
About the author: Aleksandr Evseev – Candidate of Sciences (Ph.D.) in Law, Associate Professor, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.
Citation: Evseev A. (2022) Biznes i mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravosudie: evolyutsiya vzaimootnosheniy [Business and the international criminal justice: the evolution of their relationship]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 96–116. (In Russian).
Ambos K. (2018) International Economic Criminal Law. Criminal Law Forum, vol. 29, no. 4. pp. 499–566.
Arsen’ev I.A. (2021) Prava cheloveka v deyatel’nosti korporatsiy: monografiya [Human rights in corporate activities: a monograph], Moscow: Aspekt-Press. (In Russian).
Baars G. (2013) Capitalism’s Victor’s Justice? The Hidden Stories Behind the Prosecution of Industrialists Post-WWII. In: Heller K.J., Simpson G. (eds.) The Hidden Histories of War Crimes Trials, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 163–192.
Borisov A.Yu. (2016) Nyurnberg-2, ili nesostoyavshiysya sud nad sponsorami natsizma [Nuremberg-2, or the failed trials of nazi sponsors]. Novaya i noveyshaya istoriya, no. 3, pp. 20–30. (In Russian).
Esakov G.A., Ponyatovskaya T.G., Rarog A.I., Chuchaev A.I. (2021) Ugolovno-pravovoe vozdeystvie: monografiya [Criminal law impact: a monograph], Мoscow: Prospekt. (In Russian).
Galkin A.A. (1989) Germanskiy fashizm [German fascism], Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian).
Gel’man V. (2021) Avtoritarnaya Rossiya: Begstvo ot svobody, ili Pochemu u nas ne prizhivaetsya demokratiya [Authoritarian Russia: An escape from freedom, or Why democracy fails in this country], Moscow: Govard Rork. (In Russian).
Golovanova N.A. (2022) Korporativnaya otvetstvennost’: transformatsiya ugolovno-pravovogo regulirovaniya [Corporate liability: transformation of criminal law regulation]. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel’stva i sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniya, no. 2, pp. 82–96. (In Russian).
Golovko L.V. (2015) Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost’ yuridicheskikh lits dlya Rossii: sotsial’naya potrebnost’ ili institutsional’naya globalizatsiya? [Criminal responsibility for legal entities in Russia: social need or institutional globalisation?]. Zakon, no. 5, pp. 132–142. (In Russian).
Golovko L.V. (ed.) (2016) Kurs ugolovnogo protsessa [Course of criminal procedure], Moscow: Statut. (In Russian).
Khavkin B. (2014) Reykhsfyurer SS Gimmler. Vtoroy posle Gitlera [Reichsfuehrer SS Himmler. Second after Hitler], Moscow: Algoritm. (In Russian).
Klepitskiy I.A. (2022) Novoe ekonomicheskoe ugolovnoe pravo [New economic criminal law], Moscow: Prospekt. (In Russian).
Kopylova E.A. (2019) Prestupleniya protiv mezhdunarodnogo ugolovnogo pravosudiya [The crimes against international criminal justice], Moscow: Boslen. (In Russian).
Krylova N.E., Maleshina A.V., Serebrennikova A.V. (2019) Ugolovnoe pravo zarubezhnykh stran (osobennaya chast’): uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie [Criminal law of foreign countries (special part): a handbook], Мoscow: Statut. (In Russian).
Kyriakakis J. (2021) Corporations, Accountability and International Criminal Law, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Lebedeva N.S. (ed.) (2012) SSSR i Nyurnbergskiy protsess. Neizvestnye i maloizvestnye stranitsy istorii: sbornik dokumentov [USSR and the Nuremberg trials. Unknown and little-known pages of history: a collection of documents], Мoscow: Mezhdunarodnyy fond “Demokratiya”. (In Russian).
Lochner L. (2014) Krovavyy kontrakt. Magnaty i tiran: Kruppy, Boshi, Simensy i Tretiy Reykh [Tycoons and tyrant: German industry from Hitler to Adenauer], L.Igorevskiy (transl.), Moscow: Tsentrpoligraf. (In Russian).
Manchester W. (2003) Stal’naya imperiya Kruppov [The arms of Krupp], L.Igorevskiy (transl.), Moscow: Tsentrpoligraf. (In Russian).
Marchenko M.N. (2007) Problemy yuridicheskoy i sotsial’no-politicheskoy otvetstvennosti biznesa [Problems of legal and socio-political responsibility of business]. Gosudarstvo i pravo, no. 11, pp. 5–11. (In Russian).
Mohamed S. (2020) From Machinery to Motivation: The Lost Legacy of Criminal Organizations Liability. In: Heller K.J., Mégret F., Nouwen S., Ohlin J.D. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of International Criminal Law, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 494–515.
Naumov A.V., Kibal’nik A.G. (eds.) (2022) Ugolovnoe pravo zarubezhnykh gosudarstv. Obshchaya chast’: uchebnik dlya vuzov [Criminal law of foreign states. General part: a textbook for universities], Moscow: Yurayt. (In Russian).
Nerlich V. (2010) Core Crimes and Transnational Business Corporations. Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 895–908.
Ogger G. (1976) Fridrich Flik mul’timillioner [Friedrich Flick multimillionaire], T.F.Emel’yanov (transl.), Moscow: Progress. (In Russian).
Payne L.A., Pereira G., Bernal-Bermúdez L. (2020) Transitional Justice and Corporate Accountability from Below: Deploying Archimedes’ Lever, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pauwels J. (2021) Bol’shoy bizness i Gitler [Big business and Hitler], I.Malenko (transl.), Moscow: Nashe zavtra. (In Russian).
Posner E.A., Vermeule A. (2004) Transitional Justice as Ordinary Justice. Harvard Law Review, vol. 117, no. 3, pp. 761–825.
Sassoli M., Bouvier A. et al. (eds.) (2008) Pravovaya zashchita vo vremya voyny: v 4 tomakh [How does law protect in war?], in 4 vols., Мoscow: Mezhdunarodnyy Komitet Krasnogo Kresta. (In Russian).
Stahn C. (2018) Liberals vs Romantics: Challenges of an Emerging Corporate International Criminal Law. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 91–125.
Thyssen F. (2008) Ya zaplatil Gitleru [I paid Hitler], L.Igorevskiy (transl.), Moscow: Tsentrpoligraf. (In Russian).
Traynin A.N. (1969) Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Zashchita mira i uglovnyy zakon [Selected works. Protection of peace and criminal law], Мoscow: Nauka. (In Russian).
Vereshchagin A.N. (2022) Otvetstvennost’ za klevetu i diffamatsiyu v senatskoy praktike 1870–1890-kh godov [Liability for libel and defamation in Senate practice in the 1870s–1890s]. Vestnik ekonomicheskogo pravosudiya, no. 3, pp. 174–200. (In Russian).
Weigend T. (2008) Societas Delinquere Non Potest?: A German Perspective. Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 927–945.
Werner K., Weiss H. (2007) Chernaya kniga korporatsiy [The Black Book of corporations], O.Kolosova, A.Shaverdyan (transl.), Ekaterinburg: Ul’tra.Kul’tura. (In Russian).
Zahar A. (2005) The ICTR’s “Media” Judgment and the Reinvention of Direct and Public Incitement to Commit Genocide. Criminal Law Forum, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 33–48.