Available in Russian
Authors: Aleksandr Rybin, Alyona Gerashchenko, Kirill Zyubanov
DOI: 10.21128/2226-2059-2023-4-87-102
Keywords: surveillance capitalism; personal data; consent to personal data processing; the Internet; the right to privacy
One of the unique features of the capitalist economy is that it can turn literally anything into a source of profit. The invention of the Internet, with all the technologies that have arisen in connection with it, from it and in the name of it, has led to the emergence of a digital economy that effectively monetized personal data and made it the most valuable source of capital gains. In the post-industrial 21st century, a number of researchers began to call personal data “the new oil”. However, in the 21st century, the post-industrial society has managed to make another round of development, and the expression “data is the new oil” has become the subject of criticism of experts in the field of privacy and personal data protection. The article contains a deep analysis of the place of the institution of personal data in modern society of surveillance capitalism, both from a legal and social perspectives, and also formulates the authors’ approach to the potential of one of the most conceptually effective tools for managing personal data – the subject’s consent to personal data processing. The focus of the study is the institution of personal data in the era of surveillance capitalism in the applied, empirical and theoretical planes, and the goal is to determine a uniform approach to the place and role of this institution, taking into account the characteristics of surveillance capitalism and the decisions of international, regional (for instance, European Court of Human Rights, Court of Justice of the European Union) and national judicial authorities. Given the growing importance that the institution of personal data is gaining in legal theory and practice, this article contains elements of both empirical and theoretical nature, with the expected predominance of the former. The methodological basis of the research includes logical, formal legal and grammatical methods, as well as comparative legal and functional approaches. The latter contributes to the development of a sustainable practice-oriented approach to understanding of the place and role of the legal institution of personal data, based on the de facto functioning of this institution in general and its interaction with the ideology of surveillance capitalism in particular.
About the authors: Aleksandr Rybin – Ph.D. Student, Department of Theory of Law and Comparative Law, Faculty of Law, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia; Alyona Gerashchenko – Ph.D. Student, Lecturer, Department of Digital Law and Bio-Law, Faculty of Law, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia; Kirill Zyubanov – Ph.D. Student, Department of Digital Law and Bio-Law, Faculty of Law, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.
Citation: Gerashchenko A., Rybin A., Zyubanov K. (2023) Zashchita personal’nykh dannykh v epokhu nadzornogo kapitalizma [Protection of personal data in the age of surveillance capitalism]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 87–102.
References
Cavoukian A. (2011) Privacy by Design. The 7 Foundational Principles. Available at: https://www.sfu.ca/~palys/Cavoukian-2011-PrivacyByDesign-7FoundationalPrinciples.pdf (accessed: 06.11.2023).
Efremov A. (2016) Novye informatsionnye tekhnologii v praktike Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka [New information technologies in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights]. Pretsedenty Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka, no. 6, pp. 10–15. (In Russian).
Ermakova I.V. (2021) Zashchita prav potrebiteley ot nedobrosovestnoy setevoy reklamy: nekotorye teoreticheskie i prakticheskie aspekty [Protection of consumer rights from unfair online advertising: certain theoretical and practical aspects]. Yuridicheskie issledovaniya, no. 7, pp. 29–47. (In Russian).
Foucault M. (1999) Nadzirat’ i nakazyvat’. Rozhdenie tyur’my [Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison], V. Naumov (transl.), I. Borisova (ed.), Moscow: Ad Marginem. (In Russian).
Gerashchenko A. (2022) Dialektika informatsionnoy privatnosti v usloviyakh razvitiya informatsionnoy bezopasnosti [Dialectics of information privacy and information security]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 51–72. (In Russian).
Grigor’eva K.S. (2021) Issledovaniya nadzora: osnovnye napravleniya i teoreticheskie podkhody [Surveillance research: main areas and theoretical approaches]. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny, no. 6, pp. 477–505. (In Russian).
Haggerty K.D. (2006) Tear Down the Walls: On Demolishing the Panopticon. In: Lyon D. (ed.) Theorizing Surveillance: The Panopticon and Beyond, Cullompton; Portland, OR: Willan Publishing, pp. 23–45.
Hurd H.M. (1996) The Moral Magic of Consent. Legal Theory, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 121–146.
Safronov E.E. (2021) Transformatsii kapitalizma v XXI veke: kontseptsiya “nadzornogo kapitalizma” Shoshany Zuboff [Transformation of capitalism in the 21st century: “Surveillance capitalism” concept by Shoshana Zuboff]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, no. 4, pp. 165–172. (In Russian).
Sazonova M. (2022) Personal’nye dannye v reklame: uchityvaem vazhnye momenty [Personal data in advertisement: learning important aspects]. Informatsionno-pravovoy portal GARANT.RU, 28 January. Available at: https://www.garant.ru/news/1524866/ (accessed: 06.11.2023). (In Russian).
Soboleva A.K. (2017) Svoboda vyrazheniya mneniya v praktike Evropeyskogo Suda: starye podkhody i novye tendentsii v tolkovanii stat’i 10 EKPCh [Freedom of expression in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights: old approaches and new tendencies in interpretation of article 10 of the ECHR]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Yuridicheskie nauki, no. 2, pp. 235–262. (In Russian).
Solove D.J. (2023) Murky Consent: An Approach to the Fictions of Consent in Privacy Law. Boston University Law Review, vol. 104. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4333743 (accessed: 06.11.2023). (Forthcoming).
Soshneva N.A. (2022) Targetirovannaya reklama i personal’nye dannye [Targeted advertisement and personal data]. Ex Adverso, no. 1, pp. 108–113. (In Russian).
Talapina E.V. (2022) Pravo na informatsionnoe samoopredelenie: na grani publichnogo i chastnogo [The right to informational self-determination: on the edge of public and private]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, no. 5. pp. 24–43. (In Russian).
Tereshchenko L.K. (2022) Transformatsiya ponyatiynogo apparata informatsionnogo prava v usloviyakh tsifrovizatsii [Transformation of the conceptual framework of information law in context of digitalization]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no. 12, pp. 98–110. (In Russian).
Vainio N., Miettinen S. (2015) Telecommunications Data Retention after Digital Rights Ireland: Legislative and Judicial Reactions in the Member States. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 290–309.
Westin A.F. (1970) Privacy and Freedom, New York: Atheneum.
Zuboff S. (2015) Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization. Journal of Information Technology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 75–89.
Zuboff S. (2019) The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, New York: Public Affairs.