Available in Russian
Authors: Ilya Lifshits, David Kitsmarishvili
DOI: 10.21128/2226-2059-2024-1-75-97
Keywords: EAEU Court; proceedings upon discovery of the new circumstances; decisions of international courts; law of integration union; interaction of national and international legal systems
Russian courts over the past few years have established a clear position on the legal role of the judgements of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU Court) declaring legal acts of the Eurasian Economic Commission (EEC, Commission) on the classification of goods inconsistent with the Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union. Several reasons for rejecting the legal force of such judgements of the EAEU Court have been formulated, while some of such grounds originate from the Russian legal order and one originates from the legal order of the Eurasian Economic Union. The reason deriving from the international law which has become fatal for the legal fate of the judgements of the EAEU Court, was paragraph 102 of the Statute of the Court stipulating that the judgements of the EAEU Court cannot abrogate or change the law of the Union. Accordingly, all Russian courts, including the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court, have reached a unanimous opinion on the continuing nature of the EEC legal acts despite the declaration of such acts as illegal by the EAEU Court. Thus, legal acts of public authority – the Eurasian Economic Commission – are legally effective on the territory of the Russian Federation, but there are no ordinary legal means to challenge such acts. Undoubtedly, such a situation is intolerable, since, in fact, it is a legal deadlock and, moreover, it infringes the right to judicial protection provided for by the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Based on the analysis of the practice of Russian courts, the authors conclude that remediation of this shortcoming of the legal system of the EAEU would allow Russian courts to admit legal role of the decisions of the EAEU Court. Russian procedural legislation, in particular, the provisions of the Arbitration Procedure Code on the possibility of case reconsideration on the base of the new circumstances – in case of revocation of the ruling of another body – can also be used in relation to legal acts of the Commission which were recognized as contradicting to the acts of a higher level, i.e. to the EAEU Treaty, to the Customs Code and to other treaties within the EAEU. Prior to amendments to the Statute of the EAEU, the way to remediate of this shortcoming could be the decision of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council on the procedure for the enforcement of the EAEU Court judgements invalidating the legal acts of the EEC.
About the authors: Ilya Lifshits – Doctor of Sciences in Law, Professor, , Department of International Law, Russian Foreign Trade Academy, Moscow, Russia; David Kitsmarishvili – Candidate of Sciences (Ph.D.) in Law, Attorney-at-Law, Moscow, Russia.
Citation: Lifshits I., Kitsmarishvili D. (2024) Integriruya integratsiyu: resheniya Suda Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza v pravoporyadke Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Integrating integration: judgements of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union in the legal order of the Russian Federation]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 75–97. (In Russian).
References
Alvarez J. (2003) The New Dispute Settlers: (Half) Truths and Consequences. Texas International Law Journal, vol.38, pp.405–444.
Chaika K.L. (2023) Publichnye polnomochiya organov integratsionnogo ob'edineniya [Public powers of integration association bodies]. Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn', no.2, pp.204–213. (In Russian).
D'yachenko E.B. (2022) Per aspera ad astra: Primenenie prava Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza sudami Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Per aspera ad astra: Application of the law of the Eurasian Economic Union by the courts of the Russian Federation]. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava RAN, no.6, pp.121–139. (In Russian).
D'yachenko E.B. (2023) Otpravlenie pravosudiya v sudakh integratsionnykh ob'edineniy: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [Administration of justice in the courts of integration associations: Dr. in law sci. diss.], Moscow. (In Russian).
D'yachenko E.B., Entin K.V. (2018) Svoystva prava Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza skvoz' prizmu praktiki Suda EAES [Properties of the EAEC law through the prism of the practice of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no.10, pp.123–130. (In Russian).
Ispolinov A. (2014) Trebuyutsya pragmatiki: Konstitutsionnyy Sud Rossii i evraziyskiy pravoporyadok [Pragmatics are required: the Constitutional Court of Russia and integration order]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.23, no.5, pp.14–19. (In Russian).
Ispolinov A. (2017) Ispolnenie resheniy mezhdunarodnykh sudov: teoriya i praktika [Compliance with the judgments of international courts: theory and practice]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.7, no.1, pp.45–67. (In Russian).
Ispolinov A.S. (2016) Statut Suda EAES kak otrazhenie opaseniy i somneniy gosudarstv-chlenov Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza [Statute of EAEU Court as reflection of EAEU members concerns and doubts]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, no.4, pp.152–166. (In Russian).
Ispolinov A.S. (2018) Sudy regional'nykh integratsionnykh ob'edineniy v mezhdunarodnom pravosudii: na primere Suda ES i Suda EAES: Dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [Courts of regional integration associations in international justice (on the example of the EU Court and the EAU Court): Dr. in law sci. diss.], Мoscow. (In Russian).
Kadysheva O.V. (2022) Rol' konsul'tativnykh zaklyucheniy v mezhdunarodnom pravosudii i v praktike Suda EAES [The role of advisory opinions in international justice and in the practice of the EAEU Court]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, no.1, pp.208–231. (In Russian).
Kalinichenko P., Petrov R. (2016) On Similarities and Differences of the European Union and Eurasian Economic Union Legal Orders: Is There the “Eurasian Economic Union Acquis”? Legal Issues of Economic Integration, vol.43, no.3, pp.295–307.
Karliuk M. (2017) Russian Legal Order and the Legal Order of the Eurasian Economic Union: An Uneasy Relationship. Russian Law Journal, vol.5, no.2, pp.33–52.
Kozheurov Ya.S. (2016) Instituty mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya i pravo Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza: “smotr pravovykh sil” [Institutions of international justice and the law of the Eurasian Economic Union: review of legal forces]. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, no.4, pp.4–16. (In Russian).
Menzyuk G.A., Gavrilova Yu.A., Umitchinova B.A. (2019) Sootnoshenie suvereniteta i nadnatsional'nosti v kontekste integratsionnykh protsessov v ramkakh EAES i ES [The correlation between sovereignty and supranationality in the context of integration processes within the EAEU and the EU]. Vestnik instituta zakonodatel'stva i pravovoy informatsii Respubliki Kazakhstan, no.3, pp.101–108. (In Russian).
Myslivskiy P.P. (2023) Ispolnenie aktov Suda Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza: obzor pervykh problem i putey ikh resheniya [Execution of acts of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union: review of the first problems and ways for their solution]. Zhurnal VShE po mezhdunarodnomu pravu, no.2, pp.43–54. (In Russian).
Neshataeva T. (2014) K voprosu o sozdanii Evraziyskogo Soyuza: integratsiya i nadnatsionalizm [Towards the creation of the Eurasian Union: integration and supranationalism]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.23, no.2, pp.57–70. (In Russian).
Neshataeva T. (2016) O problemakh v deystvii resheniy organov EAES v natsional'nykh pravoporyadkakh gosydarstv-chlenov [On ambiguous effects of the EAEU bodies’ decisions within national legal systems of the member states]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.6, no.3, pp.10–17. (In Russian).
Neshataeva T. (2018) Slyshat' zhizn': deystvie aktov mezhdunarodnogo suda v natsional'nykh pravovykh sistemakh [Hearing life: the effect of acts of an international court in national legal systems]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.8, no.1, pp.53–66. (In Russian).
Neshataeva T.N., Myslivskiy P.P., Dyachenko E.B. (2015) Evraziyskaya integratsiya: rol' Suda: monografiya [Eurasian integration: the role of the Court: a monograph], T.N.Neshataeva (ed.), Moscow: Statut. (In Russian).
Shchur-Trukhanovich L.V. (2016) K voprosu o konstitutsionnoy obespechennosti peredachi gosudarstvami-chlenami polnomochiy Evraziyskomu ekonomicheskomu soyuzu i Evropeyskomu Soyuzu [On the issue of constitutional security for the transfer of powers by member states to the Eurasian Economic Union and the European Union]. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel'stva i sravnitel'nogo pravovedeniya, no.4, pp.69–76. (In Russian).
Smbatyan A.S. (2013) Resheniya organov mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya i ikh rol' v ukreplenii mezhdunarodnogo pravoporyadka: Dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. [Decisions of international justice bodies and their role in strengthening the international legal order: Dr. in law sci. diss.], Мoscow. (In Russian).
Sokolova N.A. (2015) Evraziyskaya integratsiya: vozmozhnosti Suda Soyuza [Eurasian integration: powers of the Eurasion Union Court]. Lex Russica, no.11, pp.96–103. (In Russian).
Tolstykh V.L. (2023) Resheniya mezhdunarodnykh sudov: Treteyskie sudy. Postoyannaya palata mezhdunarodnogo pravosudiya. Mezhdunarodnyy tribunal po morskomu pravu [International court decisions: Arbitration, Permanent Court of International Justice, International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea], Мoscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. (In Russian).