Available in Russian
Author: Boris Nefedov
DOI: 10.21128/2226-2059-2025-3-66-77
Keywords: principles of criminal law; nullum crimen sine lege; no crime without law; general principles of law; international criminal law; the concept of crime.
The institution of individual criminal responsibility has a number of principles that characterize and clarify its content, both at the domestic and international levels. In particular, they include such principles as nullum crimen sine lege (“there is no crime without reference to it in the law”), non bis in idem (“not twice for the same thing”) and nullum poena sine lege (“there is no punishment without the law”). The importance of these principles is great, but their one-sided idealization has led academic research to the emergence of the conclusions that such principles have the same content within any legal system, and therefore are general principles of law, in the sense of Article 38(c) of the Statute of the International Court of Justice. However, the modern consolidation of the content of these principles in the criminal law of different states and in international law does not give grounds to agree with this statement. In this article, the main reasoning to support this point is focused on the principle of nullum crimen sine lege, according to which an act is only considered a crime of at the time it was committed, it was already defined as such by the criminal law of the state. The fact is that the definitions of crime (and the grounds for criminal liability) that exist so far in the national law of the vast majority of states come into direct conflict with the recognition of international law’s ability to independently criminalize certain acts of individuals. As a result, an act that is not a crime according to the criminal law of the given state may turn out to be a crime. Since the general principles of law in their content must coincide with each other in both national and international law, the article concludes that at the present stage the principle nullum crimen sine lege cannot be considered as one.
About the author: Boris Nefedov – Doctor of Sciences in Law, Associate Professor, Professor at the Department of International Relations, Faculty of World Economy and International Affairs, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Professor at the Department of Human Rights and International Law, Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia named after V. Ya. Kikot’.
Citation:
Nefedov B. (2025) Yavlyayutsya li osnovnye printsipy ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti individov obshchimi printsipami prava? Chast' 1: Printsip nullum crimen sine lege (“net prestupleniya bez ukazaniya na nego v zakone”) [Are the fundamental principles of criminal responsibility of individuals general principles of law? Part 1: The principle of nullum crimen sine lege (“no crime without reference to it in the law”)]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.15, no.3, pp.66–77. (In Russian).
References
Alizade V.A., Volevodz A.G. (2016) Printsipy mezhdunarodnogo prava, priznannye Ustavom Nyurnbergskogo tribunala: sem'desyat let spustya [Principles of international law recognized by the Nuremberg Tribunal Charter: seventy years of later]. Biblioteka kriminalista. Nauchnyy zhurnal, no.1, pp.271–294. (In Russian).
Blatova N.T., Melkov G.M. (eds.) (2011) Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: sbornik dokumentov: uchebnoe posobie [International law: collection of documents: a textbook], Moscow: RIOR. (In Russian).
Cassese A. (2008) International Criminal Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dodonov V.N. (2010) Sravnitel'noe ugolovnoe pravo. Obshhaya chast': monografiya [Comparative criminal law. General part: monograph], S.P.Shcherba (ed.), Moscow: Yurlitinform. (In Russian).
Durmanov N.D. (1948) Ponyatie prestupleniya [The concept of crime], Moscow; Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR. (In Russian).
Von Feuerbach P.J.A. (1801) Lehrbuch des Gemeinen in Deutschland gültigen peinlichen Rechts, Giessen: G.F.Heyer.
Golovsko L.V., Krylova N.E. (eds.) (2002) Ugolovnyy kodeks Frantsii. Prinyat v 1992 g. Vstupil v silu s 1 marta 1994 g. S izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami na 1 yanvarya 2002 g.: perevod s frantsuzskogo [The French Criminal Code. Adopted in 1992. Entered into force on March 1, 1994. As amended on January 1, 2002: translation from French], Saint Petersburg: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press. (In Russian).
Golovnenkov P.V. (2010) Ugolovnoe ulozhenie (Ugolovnyy kodeks) Federativnoy respubliki Germaniya: tekst i nauchno-prakticheskiy kommentariy [Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany: text and academic and practical commentary], A.I.Rarog (ed.), Moscow: Prospekt. (In Russian).
Gontar' I.Ya. (1997) Prestuplenie i sostav prestupleniya kak yavleniya i ponyatiya v ugolovnom prave: Voprosy teorii i pravotvorchestva [Crime and corpus delicti as phenomena and concepts in criminal law: Issues of theory and law-making], Vladivostok: Izdatel'stvo Dal'nevostochnogo universiteta. (In Russian).
Ignatenko G.V. (2005) Zapret povtornogo privlecheniya k otvetstvennosti (non bis in idem) kak obshchiy printsip prava [Prohibition of repeated prosecution (non bis in idem) as a general principle of law]. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, no.1, pp.75–87. (In Russian).
Koretskiy V.M. (1957) “Obshchie printsipy prava” v mezhdunarodnom prave [“General principles of law” in international law], Kyiv: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk USSR. (In Russian).
Kovalev M.I. (1987) Ponyatie prestupleniya v sovetskom ugolovnom prave [The concept of crime in Soviet criminal law], Sverdlovsk: Izdatel'stvo Ural'skogo universiteta. (In Russian).
Kozlov A.P. (2004) Ponyatie prestupleniya [The concept of crime], Saint Petersburg: Yuridicheskiy tsentr Press. (In Russian).
Maystrenko G.A. (2017) Ponyatie i priznaki prestupleniya po rossiyskomu ugolovnomu zakonodatel'stvu [The concept and characteristics of an offence under Russian criminal law]. Obrazovanie i pravo, no.10, pp.183–192. (In Russian).
Malanczuk P. (1997) Akehurst`s Modern Introduction to International Law, 7th rev. ed, London; New York: Routledge.
Müllerson R.A., Tunkin G.I. (eds.) (1989) Kurs mezhdunarodnogo prava. Tom 1: Ponyatie, predmet i sistema mezhdunarodnogo prava [Course of international law. Vol.1: The concept, subject and system of international law], in 7 vols., Moscow: Nauka. (In Russian).
Nefedov B.I. (2019) Printsipy v mezhdunarodnom prave: terminologiya [Principles in international law: terminology]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, no.1, pp.6–17. (In Russian).
Nikiforov B.S. (ed.) (1969) Primernyy ugolovnyy kodeks (SShA). Ofitsial'nyy proekt Instituta amerikanskogo prava: perevod s angliyskogo [Modal Penal Code (USA) Official project of the Americal Law Insitute: translation from English], A.S.Nikiforov (transl.), Moscow: Progress. (In Russian).
Sabitov T.R. (2024) “Non bis in idem” kak samostoyatel'nyy printsip ugolovnogo prava Rossii [“Non bis in idem” as an independent principle of Russian criminal law]. Pravoporyadok: istoriya, teoriya, praktika, no.4, pp.113–117. (In Russian).
Shaw M.N. (1997) International Law, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tunkin G.I. (1970) Teoriya mezhdunarodnogo prava [Theory of international law], Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. (In Russian).
Van den Wyngaert C., Stessens G. (1999) The International Non Bis In Idem Principle Resolving Some of the Unanswered Questions. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol.48, no.4, pp.779–804.