Available in Russian
Author: Vladislav Donakanyan
DOI: 10.21128/2226-2059-2025-3-139-165
Keywords: international air law; ecologization of aviation; CORSIA; fragmentation of law; ICAO; European Union
The article explores the influence of the environmentalization of legal frameworks governing air services on the evolution of contemporary international air law. It focuses on the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA), developed by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), and its correlation with the norms of international environmental law. The primary aim is to elucidate the transformative effect of environmental initiatives on the traditional principles of international air law, as well as to identify emerging normative conflicts and institutional divergences. The study sets out to analyze the fragmentation of international law in the context of CORSIA, determine the legal force of ICAO standards, and assess the interrelation between regional and global regulatory mechanisms. The methodological basis of the study is comprised of formal legal and comparative legal methods. A systemic approach was applied in the analysis of doctrinal sources, as well as the practice of international organizations and judicial bodies. Particular attention is devoted to the Advisory Opinion of the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea on climate change, which clarified the legal force of the Annexes to the Chicago Convention. The line of argumentation is structured around three key questions. First, the author examines the interaction between international air law and environmental law, noting that despite efforts at harmonization, CORSIA gives rise to normative conflicts-particularly with respect to the principles of common but differentiated responsibilities and non-discrimination. Second, the legal status of CORSIA as an Annex to the Chicago Convention is analyzed. Third, the study addresses the conflict between the European Union’s environmental initiatives and the universal norms of international air law, most clearly manifested in the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union regarding the extraterritorial application of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme in the aviation sector. Based on the results of the study, the author concludes that CORSIA represents a relatively successful attempt to strike a balance between the competing values of international environmental law and international air law. At the same time, its effectiveness will ultimately depend on the political will of individual states, as the Annexes to the Chicago Convention per se do not establish binding international legal obligations. Drawing on the analysis of the European Union’s environmental initiatives, the author observes that regional mechanisms for the environmentalization of air services may impose obligations that conflict with the universal norms of international air law. In this regard, the international community faces the challenge of harmonizing regional and universal mechanisms for reducing carbon emissions from civil aviation.
About the author: Vladislav Donakanyan – Ph.D. Candidate, International Law Faculty, Moscow State Institute of International Relations, Practicing Lawyer, Moscow, Russia.
Citation:
Donakanyan V. (2025) “Ozelenenie” polyotov: kak ekologizatsiya pravovogo regulirovaniya vozdushnykh soobshcheniy vliyaet na mezhdunarodnoe vozdushnoe pravo? [Greening aviation: how does the ecologization of the regulation of air services impact international air law?]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.15, no.3, pp.139–165. (In Russian).
References
Abeyratne R. (2013) Convention on International Civil Aviation: A Commentary, Cham: Springer.
Abeyratne R. (2013) Regulation of Air Transport: The Slumbering Sentinels, Cham: Springer.
Abrusci E. (2023) Judicial Convergence and Fragmentation in International Law. The Regional Systems and the United Nations Human Rights Committee, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Andenas M., Bjorge E. (2015) Introduction: From Fragmentation to Convergence in International Law. In: Andenas M., Bjorge E. (eds.) A Farewell to Fragmentation: Reassertion and Convergence in International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–34.
Anselmi M.B. (2023) Conflictive Climate Governance Architecture under the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Contexto Internacional, vol.45, no.2, pp.1–16.
Van Asselt H. (2012) Managing the Fragmentation of International Climate Law. In: Hollo E.J., Kulovesi K., Mehling M. (eds.) Climate Change and the Law, Dordrecht: Springer, pp.329–358.
Bartsch R.I.C. (2025) International Aviation Law: A Practical Guide, Abingdon; New York: Routledge.
Batalov A.A. (2020) Istochniki mezhdunarodnogo vozdushnogo prava: aktual'nye voprosy teorii i praktiki [The sources of international air law: current issues of theory and practice]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, no.3, pp.64–90. (In Russian).
Batalov A.A. (2023) Otvetstvennost' v mezhdunarodnom vozdushnom prave: problemy teorii i praktiki [Responsibility in international air law: problems of theory and practice]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 11. Pravo, no.5, pp.106–130. (In Russian).
Batalov A.A. (2024) K voprosu o predmete mezhdunarodnogo vozdushnogo prava: ot vozdushnogo prava k pravu atmosfery? [Issue of subject-matter of international air law: from air law to the law of the atmosphere?] Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, no.5, pp.34–37. (In Russian).
Bezborod'ko Yu.S. (2007) Metody i formy pravovoy konvergentsii v mezhdunarodnom prave: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [Methods and forms of legal convergence in international law: Cand. in law sci. diss.], Ekaterinburg. (In Russian).
Boklan D.S. (2015) “Ekologizatsiya” mezhdunarodnykh ekonomicheskikh otnosheniy v kontekste evolyutsii kontseptsii ustoychivogo razvitiya [“Ecologization” of international economic relations in the context of evolution of concept of sustainable development]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, no.1, pp.117–134. (In Russian).
Bordunov V.D. (2007) Mezhdunarodnoe vozdushnoe pravo. Uchebnoe posobie [International air law. Textbook], Moscow: NOU VKSh “Aviabiznes”. (In Russian).
Buissing N. (2022) Air Transport and the EU’s Environmental Agenda Struggle: A Leap of Faith or Can a CBAM Level the Playing Field? Air and Space Law, vol.47, no.6, pp.577–600.
Cavalcante A.P.C.M. (2023) Who Set the Rules in Climate Change Governance? The Case of CORSIA as an Innovative Sectoral Policy for International Aviation: Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade de Brasília, Instituto de Relações Internacionais, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Relações Internacionais.
Cogen H.G. (2019) Fragmentation. In: D’Aspremont J., Singh S. (eds.) Concepts for International Law: Contributions to Disciplinary Thought, Cheltenham; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.315–327.
Davletgil'deev R.Sh. (2013) K voprosu o podkhodakh k fragmentatsii mezhdunarodnogo prava [To the question of approaches to the fragmentation of international law]. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, no.3, pp.20–25. (In Russian).
Dempsey P.S. (2017) Public International Air Law, Montreal: Institute and Center for Research in Air & Space Law, McGill University.
Devaney J.G. (2022) Introduction to the Symposium on Incidental Jurisdiction. American Journal of International Law Unbound, vol.116, pp.160–163.
Doria C.I. (2004) Reservations to the ICCPR and CEDAW in the Light of Common but Differentiated Responsibility: Different Scenarios in Different States. Hague Yearbook of International Law, vol.17, pp.37–76.
Fuglestvedt J., Lund M.T., Kallbekken S., Samset B.H., Lee D.S. (2023) A “Greenhouse Gas Balance” for Aviation in Line with the Paris Agreement. WIREs Climate Change, vol.14, no.5. Available at: https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/wcc.839 (accessed: 17.08.2025).
Havel B.F., Mulligan J.Q. (2012) The Triumph of Politics: Reflections on the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union Validating the Inclusion of Non-EU Airlines in the Emissions Trading Scheme. Air and Space Law, vol.37, no.1, pp.3–33.
Havel B.F., Sanchez G.S. (2014) The Principles and Practice of International Aviation Law, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jaśkowski M. (2021) External Aspects of the EU ETS in Aviation in Light of CORSIA. International Community Law Review, vol.23, nos.2–3, pp.271–282.
Kolodkin R.A. (2005) Fragmentatsiya mezhdunarodnogo prava [Fragmentation of international law]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, no.2, pp.38–61. (In Russian).
Koskenniemi M. (2012) Hegemonic Regimes. In: Young M.A. (ed.) Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Рress, pp.305–324.
Leclerc T. (2019) A Sectoral Application of the Polluter Pays Principle: Lessons Learned from the Aviation Sector. Climate Law, vol.9, no.4, pp.303–325.
Lifshits I.M., Smbatyan A.S., Salia M.R. (2024) Implementatsiya Parizhskogo soglasheniya po klimatu v pravovykh sistemakh gosudarstv — uchastnikov EAES [Implementation of the Paris Climate Agreement in the legal systems of the EAEU member states]. Lex Russica, no.1, pp.103–118. (In Russian).
Lyle C. (2018) Beyond the ICAO’s CORSIA: Towards a More Climatically Effective Strategy for Mitigation of Civil-Aviation Emissions. Climate Law, vol.8, nos.1–2, pp.104–127.
Maleev Yu.N. (1987) Mezhdunarodno-pravovye problemy rezhima vozdushnogo prostranstva: Avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk [International legal issues of the airspace regime: Abstract of a dissertation … doctor of legal sciences], Moscow. (In Russian).
Maleev Yu.N. (2017) Devyataya “svoboda vozdukha” ili skrytyy kabotazh. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, no.2, pp.63–70.
Mendes de Leon P. (2012) Enforcement of the EU ETS: The EU’s Convulsive Efforts to Export its Environmental Values. Air and Space Law, vol.37, no.4/5, pp.287–306.
Milde M. (2016) International Air Law and ICAO, The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.
Napolitano E. (2018) The Chicago Convention as a Self-Contained Regime. Annals of Air and Space Law, vol.43, pp.55–104.
Neshataeva T. (2015) Evropeyskaya Konventsiya po pravam cheloveka i integratsiya integratsiy: puti preodoleniya fragmentatsii mezhdunarodnogo prava [The European Convention on Human Rights and integration of integrations: overcoming the fragmentation of international law]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.5, no.4, pp.3–10. (In Russian).
Nikitin A. (2024) Mekhanizm pogranichnoy uglerodnoy korrektirovki Evropeyskogo Soyuza v svete prava Vsemirnoy torgovoy organizatsii [The European Union’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism in light of World Trade Organization Law]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.14, no.1, pp.136–154. (In Russian).
Oellers-Frahm K. (2017) Proliferation. In: Schabas W.A., Murphy S. (eds.) Research Handbook on International Courts and Tribunals, Cheltenham; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.299–236.
Okhapkin A.A. (2022) Otsenka poter' rossiyskoy aviatsionnoy otrasli v svyazi s vnedreniem Skhemy vozmeshcheniya i sokrashcheniya emissii ugleroda dlya mezhdunarodnoy aviatsii (CORSIA) [Estimated losses to the Russian aviation industry due to the implementation of the Carbon Offset and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA)]. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost', no.4, pp.1615–1632.
Pereterskiy I.S. (1923) Vozdushnoe pravo [Air law], Moscow: Zhurnal “Vestnik vozdushnogo flota”. (In Russian).
Peters A. (2017) The Refinement of International Law: From Fragmentation to Regime Interaction and Politicization. International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol.15, no.3, pp.671–704.
Pratama G.G. (2024) Enter the CORSIA First Phase: Aeroplane Operators Embark on Offsetting Their Emissions for the First Time, Development Trajectory, and What Lies Ahead for the Scheme. Chinese Journal of Environmental law, vol.8, no.2, pp.271–283.
Schiele S. (2014) Evolution of International Environmental Regimes: The Case of Climate Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scott B.I., Trimarchi A. (2024) Fundamentals of International Aviation and Policy, New York: Routledge.
Shestakova K.D., Vissenberg A.S. (2020) Evolyutsiya diskursa o fragmentatsii mezhdunarodnogo prava [The evolution of the discourse on the fragmentation of international law]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo, no.1, pp.29–49. (In Russian).
Simma B. (2004) Fragmentation in a Positive Light. Michigan Journal of International Law, vol.25, no.4, pp.845–847.
Simma B., Pulkowski D. (2006) Of Planets and the Universe: Self-contained Regimes in International Law. European Journal of International Law, vol.17, no.3, pp.483–529.
Sipos A. (2014) International Aviation Law: Regulation in Three Dimensions, Cham: Springer.
Sokolova N.A. (2014) Evolyutsiya mezhdunarodno-pravovogo sotrudnichestva v bor'be s izmeneniem klimata [The evolution of international legal cooperation in the fight against climate change]. Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava, no.9, pp.2057–2065.
Sokolova N.A. (2021) Izmenenie klimata: razvitie mezhdunarodno-pravovogo regulirovaniya [Climate change: international legal regulation development]. Aktual'nye problemy rossiyskogo prava, no.12, pp.177–184. (In Russian).
Solntsev A.M. (2018) Izmenenie klimata: mezhdunarodno-pravovoe izmerenie [Climate change: international legal dimension]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, no.1, pp.60–78. (In Russian).
Trachtman J.P. (2011) Fragmentation, Coherence and Synergy in International Law. Transnational Legal Theory, vol.2, no.4, pp.505–536.
Truxal S. (2016) Economic and Environmental Regulation of International Aviation: From Inter-national to Global Governance, London: Routledge.
Tunkin G.I. (2019) Teoriya mezhdunarodnogo prava [Theory of international law], Moscow: Zertsalo-M.
Yehia K. (2024) Navigating the Skies: Addressing the Regulatory Shortcomings of CORSIA and the Carbon Market While Proposing a Revised Framework for Accountability and Enforcement. Oil and Gas, Natural Resources, and Energy Journal, vol.10, no.1, pp.175–208.
Young M.A. (2012) Introduction: The Productive Friction between Regimes. In: Young M.A. (ed.) Regime Interaction in International Law: Facing Fragmentation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–19.