Available in Russian
Author: Andrei Lunev
DOI: 10.21128/2226-2059-2025-3-116-138
Keywords: the CIS Commission on Human Rights; regional human rights mechanisms; the Eurasian region; the CIS Convention on Human Rights 1995; international protection of human rights
The establishment of the CIS Commission on Human Rights in 2023 marks a notable development in the Commonwealth of Independent States’ institutional landscape, particularly in the realm of human rights. This article provides a critical analysis of the Commission’s formation, objectives, and potential impact. It explores the rationale behind selecting the CIS as a platform for fostering dialogue on human rights among Eurasian states, highlighting the geopolitical and strategic motivations that underpin this initiative. The analysis is set against the backdrop of the CIS’s ongoing identity crisis and questions surrounding its relevance in the post-Soviet space. Despite the organization’s structural weaknesses and the uneven commitment of its Member States to democratic norms, the creation of the Commission is examined as a potential catalyst for revitalizing the CIS and enhancing its normative authority at both regional and international levels. However, the article argues that the Commission’s capacity to function effectively is currently hampered by significant limitations. These include a narrowly defined mandate, lack of enforcement mechanisms, and an overarching dependence on the political will of Member States. The article offers a series of recommendations aimed at strengthening the institutional framework of the Commission. These include expanding its powers, institutionalizing civil society participation, and prioritizing the adoption and implementation of the CIS Human Rights Convention as the foundation of the Commission’s work. Emphasis is placed on the importance of transparency, accountability, and cooperation with non-governmental organizations to increase the body’s legitimacy and operational effectiveness. Ultimately, the article concludes that without meaningful structural reform and political commitment, the CIS Commission on Human Rights is likely to remain a symbolic entity, one that lacks the authority and resources to meaningfully address human rights challenges within the region. Moreover, maintaining the status quo will lead to the new body being perceived as ineffective and formal, which in turn could undermine trust in it both among citizens and among states and international organizations.
About the author: Andrei Lunev – Candidate of Sciences (Ph.D.) in Law, Senior Lecturer at the Department of International Law, Ural State Law University named after V. F. Yakovlev; Yekaterinburg, Russia.
Citation:
Lunev A. (2025) Pravozashchitnyy mekhanizm SNG: kriticheskiy vzglyad na deyatel'nost' Komissii po pravam cheloveka [The human rights mechanism of the Commonwealth of Independent States: a critical analysis of the Human Rights Commission’s work]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.15, no.3, pp.116–138. (In Russian).
References
Boyashov A.S. (2021) Rasshirenie funktsiy SNG v gumanitarnoy oblasti: potentsial evraziyskoy integratsii v oblasti prav cheloveka [Task expansion of the CIS in humanitarian sphere: potential of Eurasian integration in human rights]. Evraziya. Ekspert, no.1, pp.71–75. (In Russian).
Chayka K.L. (2017) Sootnoshenie prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod i ekonomicheskoy integratsii [Correlation of human rights and fundamental freedoms and economic integration]. In: Integratsionnye protsessy v Evrope i Evrazii: rol' konventsiy Soveta Evropy [Integration processes in Europe and Eurasia: the role of the conventions of the Council of Europe], Moscow: Razvitie pravovykh sistem, pp.235–254. (In Russian).
Diyachenko E.B., Entin K.V. (2021) Tolkovanie s oporoy na konstitutsionnye traditsii gosudarstv-chlenov i zashchita prav cheloveka Sudom Evropeyskogo Soyuza i Sudom Evraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza [Interpretation based on the constitutional traditions of member states and the protection of fundamental rights by the CJEU and the EAEU Court]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no.4, pp.173–186. (In Russian).
Ispolinov A. (2014) Trebuyutsya pragmatiki: Konstitutsionnyy Sud Rossii i evraziyskiy pravoporyadok [Pragmatists required: the Russian Constitutional Court and the Eurasian legal order]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.23, no.5, pp.14–20. (In Russian).
Kas'yanov R.A., Torkunova E.A. (2015) Obespechenie prav cheloveka na postsovetskom prostranstve [Securing human rights on the post-Soviet space]. Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta, no.5, pp.56–62. (In Russian).
Kleandrov M.I. (1998) O sudebnom mekhanizme zashchity prav rossiyanina v prostranstve SNG [On the judicial mechanism for protecting the rights of Russians in the CIS]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, no.2, pp.25–36. (In Russian).
Kleandrov M.I. (2000) Kakie mezhdunarodnye sudy nuzhny dlya SNG? [What international courts are needed for the CIS?]. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, no.4, pp.21–34. (In Russian).
Kosolapov M.F. (2024) “Perezagruzka” Komissii po pravam cheloveka Sodruzhestva Nezavisimykh Gosudarstv: perspektivy razvitiya mekhanizma zashchity prav cheloveka na postsovetskom prostranstve [The “reset” of the CIS Human Rights Commission: prospects for the development of a human rights protection mechanism in the post-Soviet space]. Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn', no.4, pp.120–128. (In Russian).
Kovler A., Lebedeva Ya. (2022) Zashchita prav cheloveka stricto sensu sudami integratsionnykh ob”edineniy: opyt sravnitel'nogo analiza [Protection of human rights stricto sensu by courts of integration associations: experience of comparative analysis]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.12, no.4, pp.36–50. (In Russian).
Likhachev M.A., Khalafyan R.M. (2024) Pravozashchitnyy mekhanizm Shankhayskoy organizatsii sotrudnichestva: vozmozhnye stsenarii [The mechanism of human rights protection in the SCO: the potentialities]. Elektronnoe prilozhenie k “Rossiyskomu yuridicheskomu zhurnalu”, no.4, pp.22–35. (In Russian).
Marochkin S. (2023) Resheniya mezhdunarodnykh sudov i dogovornykh organov po pravam cheloveka v rossiyskoy sudebnoy praktike: novaya real'nost', pervye rezul'taty, vozmozhnye perspektivy [Decisions of international courts and treaty bodies in Russian judicial practice: new reality, first results, possible prospects]. Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie, vol.32, no.4, pp.32–55. (In Russian).
Marochkin S.Yu. (2023) Mezhdunarodnoe pravo v rossiyskikh sudakh: sovremennye realii [International law in Russian courts: current realities]. Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, no.1, pp.29–42. (In Russian).
Neshataeva T.N. (2023) Evraziyskiy ekonomicheskiy soyuz: organy, praktika, pravo [The Eurasian Economic Union: bodies, practice, law]. Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava, no.5, pp.187–201. (In Russian).
Nussberger A. (2022) Evropeyskiy Sud po pravam cheloveka [The European Court of Human Rights], A.G.Rumyantsev (transl.), Moscow: Institut prava i publichnoy politiki. (In Russian).
Obydenkova A.V., Libman A. (2019) Authoritarian Regionalism in the World of International Organizations: Global Perspectives and the Eurasian Enigma, New York: Oxford University Press.
Piovesan F., Cortez da Cunha Cruz J. (2022) Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR). In: Binder С., Nowak M., Hofbauer J.A., Janig P. (eds.) Elgar Encyclopedia of Human Rights, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.77–83.
Risini I., Ulfstein G. (2022) Inter-State Complaint Procedures. In: Elgar Encyclopedia of Human Rights. In: Binder С., Nowak M., Hofbauer J.A., Janig P. (eds.) Elgar Encyclopedia of Human Rights, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.334–345.
Rojas D.R. (2022) Individual and Collective Communications or Complaints Procedures. In: Binder С., Nowak M., Hofbauer J.A., Janig P. (eds.) Elgar Encyclopedia of Human Rights, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.40–50.
Shinkaretskaya G.G. (2008) Vozmozhnye puti sovershenstvovaniya Sodruzhestva [Possible ways to improve the Commonwealth]. In: Malashenko I.A. (ed.) Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 15-letiyu Ekonomicheskogo Suda SNG (21 iyunya 2007 g.) [Proceedings of the international scientific and practical conference dedicated to the 15th anniversary of the CIS Economic Court (June 21, 2007)], Minsk: Kovcheg, pp.186–194. (In Russian).
Starodubtsev G.S., Makarova S.S. (2024) Perspektivy zashchity prav cheloveka v ramkakh EAES [Prospects for human rights protection within the EAEU]. Monitoring pravoprimeneniya, no.4, pp.15–22. (In Russian).
Tolstykh V.L. (2022) Kurs mezhdunarodnogo prava: uchebnik [Course of international law: a textbook], Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. (In Russian).
Viljoen F. (2022) African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR). In: Binder С., Nowak M., Hofbauer J.A., Janig P. (eds.) Elgar Encyclopedia of Human Rights, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp.72–81.