Available in Russian
Authors: Sofia Pimenova, Inna Apurina
DOI: DOI: 10.21128/2226-2059-2025-3-98-115
Keywords: investment disputes; international investment arbitration; damage assessment; compensation; discounted cash flow method
The issue of determining the amount of compensation in the settlement of investment disputes between foreign investors and the states receiving investment is caused by the sharp increase in the amounts awarded to investors based on the results of dispute resolution in the last decade, as well as the lack of predictability and consistency in the calculation methods used by arbitrators. Often, the need to pay compensation to an investor places a heavy burden on the budget of the respondent states, having a significant impact on their finances, as well as exacerbating the overall debt of developing and least developed countries. A detailed analysis of this trend in the overall inflation of arbitration awards shows that this is a multifactorial process that cannot be explained solely by global inflation, an increase in the average size of investment projects, or growing amount of damages claimed by investors. The rapid increase in the amount of compensation, in our opinion, is largely due to the use by the arbitrators of the discounted cash flow — a valuation method that estimates the value of an investment based on its expected future cash flows (as a result of the company’s activities during full implementation of the investment project). It is the most popular method among the applicants and arbitration tribunals. This trend, in turn, also encourages the applicants to make excessive demands with the help of new methods of calculating income and discount rates that are difficult for most arbitrators to comprehend. At the same time, it is noted that the methods of damage assessment applied by the arbitration tribunals in investment disputed differ from those used in other branches of international law, and the discounted cash flow method itself remains the most difficult to use, since it requires forecasting and, consequently, making numerous assumptions. The current situation has put the states in front of the need to adequately assess it and develop a response to this approach of the arbitral tribunals. The UNCITRAL Working Group III on the Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform served as such a platform, where attempts were being made to limit the use of the discounted cash flow method by arbitrators, despite the fact that the practical implementation of these proposals remains problematic.
About the authors: Sofia Pimenova – Candidate of Sciences (Ph.D.) in Law, International Law Department, Faculty of Law, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia; Inna Apurina – Ph.D. student, International Law Department, Faculty of Law, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Citation:
Pimenova S., Apurina I. (2025) Praktika primeneniya metoda diskontirovannogo denezhnogo potoka dlya raschyota kompensatsii v investitsionnykh sporakh [The use of the discounted cash flow method for calculating compensation in investment disputes]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.15, no.3, pp.98–115. (In Russian).
References
Ahmad S. (2023) The Role of Developing Countries in Investor-State Arbitration: Reflections on Tethyan Copper v Islamic Republic of Pakistan. LSE Law Review, vol.8, no.3, pp.453–469.
Bonnitcha J., Brewin S. (2020) Compensation Under Investment Treaties What are the problems and what can be done? Available at: https://www.iisd.org/system/files/2020-12/compensation-investment-treaties-en.pdf (accessed: 26.09.2025).
Bonnitcha J., Langford M., Alvarez-Zarate J.M., Behn D. (2023) Damages and ISDS Reform: Between Procedure and Substance. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, vol.14, no.2, pp.213–241.
Boué J.C. (2023) The Investor-State Dispute Settlement Damages Playbook: To Infinity and Beyond. Journal of World Investment & Trade, vol.24, no.3, pp.372–397.
Bradfield M., Attanasio D. (2022) Non-Pecuniary Remedies Revisited: Expanding Influence of the ILC Articles? ICSID Review — Foreign Investment Law Journal, vol.37, no.1–2, pp.313–338.
Brouwer E.W. (2024) A Fair (?) Quantification of Damages in Investor-State Arbitration Proceedings: Reflections from the UNCITRAL Working Group III ISDS Reform Process. International Investment Law Journal, vol.4, no.2, pp.165–183.
Crawford J., Baetens F. (2022) The ILC Articles on State Responsibility: More than a “Plank in a Shipwreck”? ICSID Review — Foreign Investment Law Journal, vol.37, no.1–2, pp.13–19.
Demuth A. (2018) Income Approach and the Discounted Cash Flow Methodology. In: Trenor J.A. (ed.) The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration, 3rd ed., London: Law Business Research Ltd, pp.210–231.
Drahozal С. (2007) Busting Arbitration Myths. Kansas Law Review, vol.56, no.3, pp.663–667.
Elrifai S.N. (2017) Equity-Based Discretion and the Anatomy of Damages Assessment in Investment Treaty Law. Journal of International Arbitration, vol.34, no.5, pp.835–888.
Fomenko A. (2023) Assessment of Damages and Compensation in the Context of Investor-State Dispute Settlement Reform Proposals. HSE University Journal of International Law, no.2, pp.72–92.
Franck S.D. (2005) Legitimacy Crisis in Investment Treaty Arbitration: Privatizing Public International Law Through Inconsistent Decisions. Fordham Law Review, vol.73, no.4, pp.1521–1625.
Friedman M.W., Lavaud F. (2018) Damages Principles in Investment Arbitration. In: Trenor J.A. (ed.) The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration, 3rd ed., London: Law Business Research Ltd, pp.96–112.
Ispolinov A.S. (2015) Kuda idyot sovremennyy investitsionnyy arbitrazh? [Where is the present investment heading toward?] Rossiyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, no.3, pp.80–96. (In Russian).
Kahale G, III (2018) The Inaugural Brooklyn Lecture on International Business Law: “ISDS: The Wild, Wild West of International Practice”. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, vol.44, no.1, pp.1–10.
Kahale G., III (2021) It’s Quantum! Columbia FDI Perspectives, no.314. Available at: https://d20qsj1r5k97qe.cloudfront.net/news-attachments/George-Kahale-Its-Quantum-Columbia-FDI-Perspectives-September-2021.pdf (accessed: 26.09.2025).
Marboe I. (2006) Compensation and Damages in International Law: The Limits of “Fair Market Value”. Journal of World Investment & Trade, vol.7, no.5, pp.723–759.
Marzal T. (2021) Quantum (In)Justice: Rethinking the Calculation of Compensation and Damages in ISDS. Journal of World Investment & Trade, vol.22, no.2, pp.249–312.
Pimenova S. (2025) Nezamechennoe nasledie dela YuKOSa: dilemma vybora daty otsenki investitsiy v investitsionnom arbitrazhe [The unnoticed legacy of the Yukos case: the dilemma of choosing the valuation date of an investment in investment arbitration]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.15, no.1, pp.136–149. (In Russian).
Pimenova S.D. (2025) Osobennosti primeneniya mezhdunarodnykh obychaev v praktike investitsionnogo arbitrazha [Application of the rules of customary international law in the practice of investor-state arbitral tribunals]. Pravoprimenenie, no.2, pp.159–168. (In Russian).
Rachkov I. (2014) Byvshie aktsionery “YuKOSa” protiv Rossii: Kommentariy k arbitrazhnomu resheniyu pod egidoy Postoyannoy Palaty Treteyskogo Suda v Gaage [Former “Yukos” shareholders v. Russia: A commentary on the arbitral award rendered under the auspices of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in the Hague]. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, vol.4, no.3, pp.18–34. (In Russian).
Ripinsky S., Williams K. (2008) Damages in International Investment Law, London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law.
Schumacher K.F., Klönne H. (2018) Discounted Cash Flow Method. In: Beharry C.L. (ed.) Contemporary and Emerging Issues on the Law of Damages and Valuation in International Investment Arbitration, Leiden: Brill | Nijhoff, pp.205–230.
Simmons J.B. (2012) Valuation in Investor-State Arbitration: Toward a More Exact Science. Berkeley Journal of International Law, vol.30, no.1, pp.196–250.
Yukhno A.S. (2015) Mezhdunarodno-pravovye aspekty vyplaty kompensatsii pri razreshenii investitsionnykh sporov gosudarstv: Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [International legal aspects of compensation payment in the resolution of investment disputes of the States: Cand. in law sci. diss.], Moscow. (In Russian).
Wälde T.W. (2009) Improving the Mechanisms for Treaty Negotiations and Investment Disputes: Competition and Choice as the Path to Quality and Legitimacy. In: Sauvant K.P. (ed.) Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy, 2008–2009, New York: Oxford University Press, pp.505–585.